As you can tell from the reader numbers on my columns, it is often very difficult to get people to consume content about the climate. In other news, a climate-based film is the biggest movie in the US.
Here is how to make it make sense: If you write a news article or column about climate, the odds are strong it will be too depressing, too repetitive or too wonky to attract eyeballs. However, if you make 2 Dune 2 Sandy starring Timothee Chalamet, Zendaya, Austin Butler, Florence Pugh and several other beautiful people riding cool spaceships and giant worms, people will line up to see it. It turns out the best route for delivering climate messages is often an indirect one.
To be sure, Dennis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two — which vacuumed up US$82.5 million in the US and US$182.5 million globally in its opening weekend — is not immediately recognizable as a climate story.
Illustration: Mountain People
If anything, it is arguably more of an allegory about crude oil, with massive powers warring over a commodity (spice) that enables long-distance travel. (Except this commodity also makes you live longer and gets you really, really high.)
However, the entire Dune saga is rooted in the climate of the fictional planet Arrakis. Please allow my mentat eyeballs to roll up into my head while I retrieve the lore: This is a desert planet populated with native creatures (sandworms) that live in harmony with their environment, a simple existence of eating sand, making spice and being large. The humans on the planet have also adapted to the harsh climate, wearing suits that collect and recycle every drop of their bodily drippings so they do not die of thirst. Their spartan lifestyle also makes them leathery enough to take on the colonial-capitalist powers exploiting the planet’s resources.
The novel on which the movies are based is also rooted in ecology.
Author Frank Herbert’s study of efforts to control Oregon sand dunes led him down a wormhole of dunes and deserts that inspired him to write a doorstopper of a novel about a sandy planet (followed by five more).
Herbert dedicated the book “to the dry-land ecologists” and claimed he meant it to be “an environmental awareness handbook.”
He also embraced environmentalism, spoke on the first Earth Day in 1970, put solar panels on his house and never bought a new car.
However, the key to the commercial success of Dune — one of the best-selling science-fiction novels of all time and a movie franchise threatening to make US$1 billion at the box office — might be that it keeps the whole climate thing subliminal.
You can enjoy it for its cool spaceships, giant worms, desert battles, freaky metaphysics and much more without having to think too hard about the environment.
This fits a recurring pattern of juicy pieces of fictional meat helping people swallow a bitter climate pill hidden inside. In the smash-hit video game and HBO series The Last of Us, for example, global warming makes the Cordyceps fungus mutate until it can thrive in hot human bodies. Cannibal zombies ensue.
The cool part is the zombies and Bella Ramsey and Pedro Pascal of it all. But while you are enjoying that you are also ingesting a dose of climate awareness.
Compare and contrast this with fare such as Don’t Look Up, where the climate pill is barely hidden, or Extrapolations, the Apple TV series where the pill is the only thing on the menu. Far fewer people watched or enjoyed those. I can relate.
Then again, skillful creators can produce climate content that is closer to the nose but also enjoyable. Octavia Butler, Margaret Atwood, Nnedimma Okorafor, J.G. Ballard, Kim Stanley Robinson, Richard Powers, Paolo Bacigalupi, Barbara Kingsolver and many more have managed it, to name a few.
It is tempting to feel as if everything that needs to be said about climate change has already been said and that it is depressing and pointless to keep saying it.
“It’s 109 degrees [F=42.8°C] in Portland right now. It’s been over 130 degrees in Baghdad several times,” former climate journalist Sarah Miller wrote in 2021. “What kind of awareness quotient are we looking for? What more about climate change does anyone need to know? What else is there to say?”
And she wrote this long before a year in which the climate broke dreary new records month after month after month.
But maybe those of us still slogging through the climate-awareness fight just are not trying hard enough to tell a better story. Dune is one of the best. Let us never stop trying to top it.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS