As you can tell from the reader numbers on my columns, it is often very difficult to get people to consume content about the climate. In other news, a climate-based film is the biggest movie in the US.
Here is how to make it make sense: If you write a news article or column about climate, the odds are strong it will be too depressing, too repetitive or too wonky to attract eyeballs. However, if you make 2 Dune 2 Sandy starring Timothee Chalamet, Zendaya, Austin Butler, Florence Pugh and several other beautiful people riding cool spaceships and giant worms, people will line up to see it. It turns out the best route for delivering climate messages is often an indirect one.
To be sure, Dennis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two — which vacuumed up US$82.5 million in the US and US$182.5 million globally in its opening weekend — is not immediately recognizable as a climate story.
Illustration: Mountain People
If anything, it is arguably more of an allegory about crude oil, with massive powers warring over a commodity (spice) that enables long-distance travel. (Except this commodity also makes you live longer and gets you really, really high.)
However, the entire Dune saga is rooted in the climate of the fictional planet Arrakis. Please allow my mentat eyeballs to roll up into my head while I retrieve the lore: This is a desert planet populated with native creatures (sandworms) that live in harmony with their environment, a simple existence of eating sand, making spice and being large. The humans on the planet have also adapted to the harsh climate, wearing suits that collect and recycle every drop of their bodily drippings so they do not die of thirst. Their spartan lifestyle also makes them leathery enough to take on the colonial-capitalist powers exploiting the planet’s resources.
The novel on which the movies are based is also rooted in ecology.
Author Frank Herbert’s study of efforts to control Oregon sand dunes led him down a wormhole of dunes and deserts that inspired him to write a doorstopper of a novel about a sandy planet (followed by five more).
Herbert dedicated the book “to the dry-land ecologists” and claimed he meant it to be “an environmental awareness handbook.”
He also embraced environmentalism, spoke on the first Earth Day in 1970, put solar panels on his house and never bought a new car.
However, the key to the commercial success of Dune — one of the best-selling science-fiction novels of all time and a movie franchise threatening to make US$1 billion at the box office — might be that it keeps the whole climate thing subliminal.
You can enjoy it for its cool spaceships, giant worms, desert battles, freaky metaphysics and much more without having to think too hard about the environment.
This fits a recurring pattern of juicy pieces of fictional meat helping people swallow a bitter climate pill hidden inside. In the smash-hit video game and HBO series The Last of Us, for example, global warming makes the Cordyceps fungus mutate until it can thrive in hot human bodies. Cannibal zombies ensue.
The cool part is the zombies and Bella Ramsey and Pedro Pascal of it all. But while you are enjoying that you are also ingesting a dose of climate awareness.
Compare and contrast this with fare such as Don’t Look Up, where the climate pill is barely hidden, or Extrapolations, the Apple TV series where the pill is the only thing on the menu. Far fewer people watched or enjoyed those. I can relate.
Then again, skillful creators can produce climate content that is closer to the nose but also enjoyable. Octavia Butler, Margaret Atwood, Nnedimma Okorafor, J.G. Ballard, Kim Stanley Robinson, Richard Powers, Paolo Bacigalupi, Barbara Kingsolver and many more have managed it, to name a few.
It is tempting to feel as if everything that needs to be said about climate change has already been said and that it is depressing and pointless to keep saying it.
“It’s 109 degrees [F=42.8°C] in Portland right now. It’s been over 130 degrees in Baghdad several times,” former climate journalist Sarah Miller wrote in 2021. “What kind of awareness quotient are we looking for? What more about climate change does anyone need to know? What else is there to say?”
And she wrote this long before a year in which the climate broke dreary new records month after month after month.
But maybe those of us still slogging through the climate-awareness fight just are not trying hard enough to tell a better story. Dune is one of the best. Let us never stop trying to top it.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS