As you can tell from the reader numbers on my columns, it is often very difficult to get people to consume content about the climate. In other news, a climate-based film is the biggest movie in the US.
Here is how to make it make sense: If you write a news article or column about climate, the odds are strong it will be too depressing, too repetitive or too wonky to attract eyeballs. However, if you make 2 Dune 2 Sandy starring Timothee Chalamet, Zendaya, Austin Butler, Florence Pugh and several other beautiful people riding cool spaceships and giant worms, people will line up to see it. It turns out the best route for delivering climate messages is often an indirect one.
To be sure, Dennis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two — which vacuumed up US$82.5 million in the US and US$182.5 million globally in its opening weekend — is not immediately recognizable as a climate story.
Illustration: Mountain People
If anything, it is arguably more of an allegory about crude oil, with massive powers warring over a commodity (spice) that enables long-distance travel. (Except this commodity also makes you live longer and gets you really, really high.)
However, the entire Dune saga is rooted in the climate of the fictional planet Arrakis. Please allow my mentat eyeballs to roll up into my head while I retrieve the lore: This is a desert planet populated with native creatures (sandworms) that live in harmony with their environment, a simple existence of eating sand, making spice and being large. The humans on the planet have also adapted to the harsh climate, wearing suits that collect and recycle every drop of their bodily drippings so they do not die of thirst. Their spartan lifestyle also makes them leathery enough to take on the colonial-capitalist powers exploiting the planet’s resources.
The novel on which the movies are based is also rooted in ecology.
Author Frank Herbert’s study of efforts to control Oregon sand dunes led him down a wormhole of dunes and deserts that inspired him to write a doorstopper of a novel about a sandy planet (followed by five more).
Herbert dedicated the book “to the dry-land ecologists” and claimed he meant it to be “an environmental awareness handbook.”
He also embraced environmentalism, spoke on the first Earth Day in 1970, put solar panels on his house and never bought a new car.
However, the key to the commercial success of Dune — one of the best-selling science-fiction novels of all time and a movie franchise threatening to make US$1 billion at the box office — might be that it keeps the whole climate thing subliminal.
You can enjoy it for its cool spaceships, giant worms, desert battles, freaky metaphysics and much more without having to think too hard about the environment.
This fits a recurring pattern of juicy pieces of fictional meat helping people swallow a bitter climate pill hidden inside. In the smash-hit video game and HBO series The Last of Us, for example, global warming makes the Cordyceps fungus mutate until it can thrive in hot human bodies. Cannibal zombies ensue.
The cool part is the zombies and Bella Ramsey and Pedro Pascal of it all. But while you are enjoying that you are also ingesting a dose of climate awareness.
Compare and contrast this with fare such as Don’t Look Up, where the climate pill is barely hidden, or Extrapolations, the Apple TV series where the pill is the only thing on the menu. Far fewer people watched or enjoyed those. I can relate.
Then again, skillful creators can produce climate content that is closer to the nose but also enjoyable. Octavia Butler, Margaret Atwood, Nnedimma Okorafor, J.G. Ballard, Kim Stanley Robinson, Richard Powers, Paolo Bacigalupi, Barbara Kingsolver and many more have managed it, to name a few.
It is tempting to feel as if everything that needs to be said about climate change has already been said and that it is depressing and pointless to keep saying it.
“It’s 109 degrees [F=42.8°C] in Portland right now. It’s been over 130 degrees in Baghdad several times,” former climate journalist Sarah Miller wrote in 2021. “What kind of awareness quotient are we looking for? What more about climate change does anyone need to know? What else is there to say?”
And she wrote this long before a year in which the climate broke dreary new records month after month after month.
But maybe those of us still slogging through the climate-awareness fight just are not trying hard enough to tell a better story. Dune is one of the best. Let us never stop trying to top it.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS