Last week, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the annual report on the implementation of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy.
The resolution contained strong, supportive language for Taiwan, saying: “Neither Taiwan nor China is subordinate to the other” and “only Taiwan’s democratically elected government can represent the Taiwanese people on the international stage.”
It is important to keep in mind that the resolution is more symbolic than substantial.
The parliament has no power to set or implement EU policy, which is the job of the European Council and the European Commission respectively, but it could be thought of as the seat of the EU’s moral conscience.
EU-Taiwan relations are constrained by European nations’ perceived interests and “one China” policies. However, that is not to say that parliamentary resolutions are meaningless.
It is often said that the EU is not a geopolitical actor — internally divided and lacking a unified EU military. Critics say that the bloc is not capable of shaping its external environment in the same way that true great powers like the US and Russia could.
This criticism is not exactly true. The EU’s power is derived less from its military might, and more from its ability to shape the norms and values of international politics.
The EU has been described by some experts as being a “normative power,” in that it shapes its external environment more to its liking through the promotion of norms such as human rights, democracy and freedom, and setting an example for others to follow.
The European Parliament plays an important role in backing Taiwan and shaping the discourse in support of the nation’s democracy and freedom against China’s propaganda campaigns.
The parliament, through its resolutions, said what the commission’s officials or national leaders might not say, for fear of harming bilateral relations with China. While the bloc’s “one China” policy constrains EU-Taiwan relations, the parliament ensures it does not silence the nation entirely.
It is unlikely that the EU would heed its call to initiate “preparatory measures for negotiations on a bilateral investment agreement with Taiwan,” or to deepen security cooperation. However, the direction of the European project signals positive developments.
EU member states no longer wish to tolerate Germany’s geopolitical folly of building a trade and energy dependency on authoritarian powers into the heart of the European project. This dependence came at the expense of solidarity with Ukraine, and many Europeans do not want to see something similar happen to Taiwan.
Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine is changing the balance of power in the European project. With Germany and France’s theory of diplomacy thoroughly discredited, many are talking about a movement of power east, toward Central and Eastern European countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltics, which have more geopolitical clout after being proven right in their warnings about Russia and China. This movement to the east would only be turbocharged when Ukraine eventually joins.
The growing influence of states such as Poland and the Czech Republic, which are strongly supportive of Taiwan, suggest that a changing Europe would greatly benefit the nation.
Central and Eastern European countries know what it is like to live under authoritarianism and they are less likely than their Western neighbors to take the liberal international order for granted.
A more geopolitically assertive Europe could help chasten China and strengthen Taiwan, in time.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s