On Feb. 17, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency launched an H3 rocket from Tanegashima Space Center, signifying the retirement of the H-IIA rockets that the agency had used for more than 20 years. The move has greatly boosted Japan’s confidence and vision in developing new space projects.
The launch has two implications:
First, the design of the H3 reduces the cost of launching rockets from approximately ￥10 billion (US$66.5 million) for the H-IIA to ￥5 billion, indicating that Japan has reached a milestone in encouraging private use of rockets and satellite launches.
Japan is one of the few democratic countries in East Asia with facilities such as the two launch sites is has at the space center at the southern end of Tanegashima Island in Kagoshima Prefecture.
Most of Taiwan’s satellites are launched from the US, but with the success of Japan’s H3 launch and given Taipei’s friendship with Tokyo, Taiwan’s choice of partners for satellite launches could be expanded. Through the private sector or government collaboration, Taiwan and Japan can work together to reduce the cost of launches and boost satellite data exchange security.
Second, in addition to passing the Basic Space Act in 2008, Japan has also passed the Space Activities Act and the Satellite Telemetry Act since 2016. The former is to promote private participation in new business opportunities in space and establish new start-up industries, while the latter is to prevent private companies from obtaining high-definition images that could be leaked to enemy nations, safeguarding the security of the country and its allies.
Japan passed the Space Resources Act in 2021, allowing private-sector entities to participate in space exploration and obtain corporate development rights. There are opportunity due to Japan’s participation in the US’ moon program and planned Mars program.
Given the vast resources in space, Japan has begun to release some of its government-owned technologies and licenses to create business opportunities through public-private cooperation.
In other words, Japan could create more business opportunities as restrictions ease and new space-related systems emerge.
The systemic changes would give Japan a more flexible approach to pursue national interests and stimulate the private sector to develop space industries, which can be a reference for Taiwan’s space development.
Taiwan passed the Space Development Act (太空發展法) in 2021, set up the Syuhai launch site in Pingtung County’s Mudan Township (牡丹) in 2022 and made the Taiwan Space Agency an independent entity last year. The changes are intended to make space a strategic industry.
Using Japan’s space development as a guide, Taiwan can draw lessons from its legislative moves, regulatory loosening and private participation incentives. Taipei can also extend exchanges with Japan through “space diplomacy” — increasing dialogue on the economy, trade, security and technology.
Cheng Tzu-chen is a professor in Chinese Culture University’s Department of Political Science.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS