An unprecedented doctors’ strike in South Korea is in full swing, disrupting medical operations and putting public health at risk.
The strike should be a wake-up call for Taiwan, which is also becoming a “super-aged” society and has for a long time had a shortage of medical workers.
At the center of the dispute that has caused young doctors in South Korea to walk off the job is a government plan to admit 2,000 more applicants to medical schools per year to cope with the country’s fast-aging population. South Korea has only 2.6 doctors per 1,000 people, a ratio that is among the lowest among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Nearly 9,000 medical interns and residents, about 70 percent of South Korea’s junior doctors, have been on strike since Feb. 20 to protest the government’s plans. The South Korean government has threatened legal action against the striking doctors and suspension of medical licenses of up to 7,000 of them if they do not return to work.
A Gallup survey showed that about 80 percent of South Koreans were in favor of the government’s push to increase the number of medical students and its president’s approval rating climbed to a three-month high, indicating that he has gained support from people frustrated with the strike. However, most of the striking doctors have defied the government’s ultimatums and on Monday organized a huge rally.
The stalemate has sparked debate in Taiwan, which should be a sign to president-elect William Lai (賴清德) — a former physician who vowed to make improving public health services a priority — to focus on reforming the medical system, including the National Health Insurance.
More than one-quarter of Taiwan’s administrative regions are already “super-aged” societies, beating government predictions of when they would reach that stage. Taiwan as a whole is expected to reach the “super-aged” threshold of at least 20 percent of the population — or about 4.29 million people — aged 65 or older no later than next year.
Taiwan has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world. In 2002, 248,000 babies were born in Taiwan and the number fell to fewer than 136,000 last year. The birthrate decline has led to Taiwan having just 3.1 doctors for every 1,000 people, far behind the OECD average of 3.7.
Since 1998, Taiwan has capped medical school recruitment at 1,300. The Ministry of Health and Welfare has tried to add 100 government-sponsored medical students per year and opened the door to medical students from nine advanced countries to take the physician certification exam and practice in Taiwan, but doctors’ associations have opposed the policies. Meanwhile, hospitals face recruitment difficulties, especially in their pediatric, obstetrics and gynecology, internal, surgery and emergency departments. Some hospitals are forced to put senior doctors on night shifts.
Some physicians’ associations argue that the number of doctors rose from 49,000 in 2018 to 54,000 in 2022, but that broad statistic overlooks the crucial factor of uneven distribution, with doctors tending to prefer working in urban areas, where the pay is better, and in less-stressful departments. That leaves many rural heath providers understaffed, even with the government increasing subsidies for them.
The government must improve salaries and work conditions at under-staffed departments.
The government budget for medical spending in 2022 reached a record high of more than NT$1.7 trillion (US$53.86 billion). At about 7.5 percent of GDP, that was close to the OECD average of 8 percent, but lower than South Korea’s 10 percent, so there is plenty of scope for the government to redistribute resources. Medical reform is urgently needed to train talent and safeguard the health of Taiwanese.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for