Over the past few years, intense media scrutiny has prompted a growing number of companies to acquire high-quality carbon credits. To avoid accusations of “greenwashing,” many of these firms have been actively seeking credits that deliver tangible benefits to local communities, instead of merely offsetting their emissions.
Ghana is ready to help. It has devoted more than 15 years to developing a robust forest conservation program. After extensive planning and preparation, Ghana is ready to offer high-integrity credits to buyers in the “Global North” who are eager to show their commitment to fighting deforestation.
Several forest protection schemes have come under fire in recent years. Critics argue that corporations are seeking carbon credits not to reduce deforestation, but to meet their climate targets and validate their claims of carbon neutrality.
However, jurisdictional programs like Ghana’s are different. These initiatives are designed to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, covering vast areas while addressing some of the problems faced by individual projects. For example, they mitigate the risk of illegal deforestation outside of designated conservation zones.
This concept is not new. Article 5 of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change encourages developed countries to offer results-based payments to developing countries that achieve emission reduction targets. Over the past two decades, jurisdictional forest protection efforts have been largely funded by public donors, while corporate support has flowed toward specific emission reduction projects through the voluntary carbon market. However, this is changing and countries like Ghana are leading the way.
Ghana’s high forest zone, located within the Guinean Forests of West Africa, is recognized as one of the world’s 36 biodiversity hotspots. In 2008, an alarming increase in deforestation rates prompted Ghana’s government to join the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) and develop its forest conservation program, with the goal of harnessing carbon finance to halt and reverse deforestation.
Five critical commodity-linked areas for intervention were identified — with the financial support of the FCPF, the World Bank and the Green Climate Fund — and benefit-sharing strategies tailored to the diverse needs of stakeholders were devised. Specialized measurement technologies were also developed, enabling more accurate monitoring of the carbon in Ghana’s forests.
After spending nearly two decades laying the necessary technical groundwork and establishing relationships with local communities, Ghana recently entered the voluntary carbon market. It is preparing to issue jurisdictional carbon credits through the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, thereby enabling domestic and international companies to support conservation efforts.
Ghana’s objective is to transform carbon credits into a long-term revenue steam. To this end, it recently became one of the first countries to sign an emission reduction agreement with the Lowering Emissions by Accelerating Forest Finance (LEAF) Coalition and is set to receive US$50 million for reducing carbon dioxide emissions by up to 5 million tonnes.
While buyers in the Global North might view carbon credits as instrumental in meeting their climate targets, they represent a more profound shift in Ghana. The revenue generated from these credits turns into tangible income for local communities, allowing households to financially benefit from forest preservation. These credits are more than a financial resource; they are a testament to years of hard work and commitment to environmental stewardship.
For this program to be effective, buyers must recognize that integrity and impact require substantial investment. High-quality credits should do more than bolster corporate climate strategies. They should also contribute to the preservation of the world’s forests.
In essence, this means providing communities with financial incentives to conserve trees instead of cutting them down. The LEAF agreement, which values carbon dioxide emissions at US$10 per tonne, is a good first step. However, it is not enough, because returns on illegal deforestation are higher.
Given that carbon pricing appears to have been designed by and for those on the demand side, Global North buyers should consult countries like Ghana to understand the true cost of producing high-integrity credits. Prices should account for the necessary preparatory work and, crucially, exceed the rates paid to illegal loggers and miners.
Carbon credits are not like aid funds, which are distributed by countries according to their own assessments of what they can or should give. Rather, they are payments for emission reductions that countries like Ghana have worked hard to achieve — and that are crucial to limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
Potential buyers should visit Ghana and see the challenges humans must face in fighting deforestation. After, they can discuss pricing that reflects the real value of Ghana’s accomplishments.
Roselyn Fosuah Adjei is climate change director at Ghana’s Forestry Commission and National REDD+ Focal Point for Ghana.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s