Taiwan’s economy has gradually rebounded from a slowdown that started in the second quarter of last year. GDP is set to grow by the fastest pace in three years, but over-reliance on the technology sector, a talent shortage and imbalanced power generation development might limit continued economic expansion in the coming years, Pegatron Corp chairman and Taipei Computer Association honorary chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) said at a forum in Taipei on Friday last week.
Overseas shipments of Taiwan-made electronics, semiconductors, computers and communication devices accounted for 55 percent of the nation’s overall exports last year, Tung said, adding that the ratio could exceed 60 percent if shipments of precision machinery and optical equipment were included.
There is no doubt that steady development in the technology sector has enabled Taiwan to play a pivotal role in global supply chains, specifically in the semiconductor industry. It has become a major pillar of the nation’s economy, but is the growth sustainable?
With globalization, an ever-evolving landscape of geopolitics, stricter technology controls around the world and rising production costs due to demographic shifts and natural resource scarcity, Taiwanese technology firms must seek new niche markets to stay afloat, Tung said. “The nation’s industrial landscape needs to be more diverse,” he said.
Tung also mentioned challenges the nation is facing — including renewable energy intermittency and Taiwan’s geographical features. The government should be more cautious with energy policy and prepare for new technology, he said.
Taiwan has been working toward boosting its solar efficiency and has been using cleaner and more sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels, such as wind power and hydropower.
The economy this year would likely expand by 3.43 percent, compared with last year’s 1.31 percent, the largest increase since 2021, when the economy grew 6.62 percent, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS).
The estimated growth is slightly higher than the average 3.26 percent from 2013 to 2022, indicating the growth momentum would likely return to normal this year. However, slow global economic recovery and uncertainty with geopolitical risks would drive firms to remain prudent in capital expenditure planning.
Private investment is expected to grow 1.45 percent this year, down 1.72 percentage points from the previous estimate and lower than the 6.76 percent average growth from 2013 to 2022, the DGBAS said.
This begs the question: Are there any other industries that would increase their investments and help stabilize Taiwan’s economy when the nation’s main industries are in bad shape?
Over the past few years, local media have often referred to the biotech industry as another “sacred mountain” protecting the country just like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. However, it is doubtful whether this industry is globally competitive.
Taiwan’s aging population and declining birthrate could also prompt the healthcare system to acquire more medical equipment and boost the development of biomedicine and pharmaceuticals. However, this would require massive investment and years of research and development.
Meanwhile, the information and communications technology industry has seen growth amid the artificial intelligence (AI) frenzy, with those focused on AI performing exceptionally well. It remains to be seen whether this industry will continue on its upward trend in the years to come.
Vice President William Lai (賴清德) is set to take office as president on May 20. Policies that can ease Taiwanese industries’ difficulties and help the economy grow would show that the new government truly believes in “Made in Taiwan.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of