A set of amendments to the Assisted Reproduction Act (人工生殖法) is listed as a priority bill for the new legislative session. The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) held its first public hearing on Tuesday to gather opinions on expanding eligibility for assisted reproduction and the legalization of surrogacy.
Currently, married heterosexual couples have access to assisted reproductive procedures such as intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization if one of them is diagnosed with infertility or major genetic diseases and the wife can give birth.
The draft act was proposed in 1996, with many discussions on whether surrogacy should be legalized, and was enacted in 2007, but excluded surrogacy.
With the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2019, calls for amendments began to resurface. Assisted reproduction is limited to married heterosexual couples, so single women and female same-sex couples are not covered. Surrogacy is banned so, married women with uterine conditions and male same-sex couples cannot have a child unless they adopt or seek a surrogate abroad.
The ministry is drafting amendments to the act, which might include surrogacy, Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) said in November last year. However, he stressed that the ministry has no fixed position on the expansion of assisted reproduction eligibility and the legalization of surrogacy, but has held specialist meetings and would submit a bill to the Cabinet after holding public hearings.
Government officials, lawmakers, law and medical professionals, religious groups and representatives of children’s rights, women’s rights and same-sex couples’ rights attended the first hearing. The ministry has restated that it has no predetermined goal or schedule set for the bill. The hearing lasted two hours, with a majority of attendants in support of expanding assisted reproductive eligibility to include single women and female same-sex couples.
The most agreed upon opinion was that protecting the rights of children born through assisted reproduction must be prioritized, while the legalization of surrogacy remained highly controversial, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Chou Jih-haw (周志浩) said.
Surrogacy is much more complicated, as it touches on ethical concerns such as the possibility of exploitation when it comes to commercial surrogacy and legal issues such as the protection of the surrogate mother, the intended parents, the child’s rights and the legal definition of parenthood, especially when it comes to genetic surrogacy.
Commercial surrogacy is legal in only a handful of places such as Israel, Georgia, Mexico, Ukraine, Russia and a few US states. Some countries also prohibit transnational surrogacy, while more than a dozen countries allow “altruistic” surrogacy with some eligibility limitations. It remains a controversial topic even in countries where it is legal and changes to the law continue to be made.
The ministry is not ruling out holding more sessions if people cannot reach a consensus, Chou said on Tuesday.
Before the act was promulgated, the Department of Health (now the MOHW) held more than 20 specialist meetings, multiple international roundtable discussions as well as surveys. Nearly two decades later, civic groups and experts still remain divided.
There is nothing wrong with gathering more opinions and being careful, but for legislation to proceed, the ministry has to draw the line somewhere.
These discussions have been going on for almost three decades. Parents must not be made to wait another decade or forced to go abroad for assisted reproduction.
The ministry must decide whether to submit its amendment bill in two phases — addressing the expansion of eligibility first and then tackling surrogacy and its supplementary measures — or to submit a comprehensive bill that encompasses both issues.
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
While the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consistently sends drones to harass military bases in Taiwan’s outlying islands and along the coastline, new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo told the Washington Post that the US military would implement a “Hellscape” strategy involving thousands of uncrewed systems to deter a Chinese invasion. Josh Rogin, who authored the article which was published on Monday last week, spoke to Paparo on the sidelines of the recent Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore. Paparo told him that as soon as China’s invasion force began to move across the 180km Taiwan Strait, the US military
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has once again resorted to its age-old tactic of blaming the US for China’s woes. The Financial Times on Sunday reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that China would not invade Taiwan because it was a trap set by the US. This is not just an attempt to deflect blame, but also a textbook example of the CCP’s “divide and conquer” strategy to sow discord between Europe and the US. However, the blame game reveals deeper problems. Xi’s power rests on the support of the Chinese People’s Liberation
During a meeting in April, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that the US was trying to provoke China to invade Taiwan, the Financial Times reported on Sunday last week. War with the US would destroy many of China’s achievements and undermine his goal of achieving China’s “great rejuvenation,” Xi was quoted as saying. If Xi genuinely believes the US is goading China, it shows that “concerns that Xi has created an information vacuum” or is getting bad council are “worryingly, true,” Center for Strategic and International Studies Freeman chair in China Studies Jude Blanchette