Electricity rates might be raised in April, a recent announcement from the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
This has triggered a series of debates.
Since a 3 percent hike was introduced in 2018, electricity rates have remained the same for over four years.
In terms of electricity rates, globally, Taiwan ranks the fourth-lowest when it comes to household electricity prices and sixth-lowest for industrial electricity prices, statistics released by the International Energy Agency in 2020 showed.
Currently, average household electricity rates are NT$2.56 per kilowatt-hour (kWh), much lower than that of South Korea (NT$3.07/kWh) and Japan (NT$7.54/kWh). In Denmark, the price is NT$9/kWh.
The cost of fuel has increased drastically over the past two years.
Many countries, such as Japan, South Korea, the US and Germany, have adjusted their electricity rates accordingly since 2021.
In Taiwan, the government’s policy is to absorb as much of the cost as possible.
This is so that the public’s basic needs are met and so that the possibility of inflation rising due to electricity price hikes could be avoided.
However, these days, fuel prices show no signs of decreasing and it looks like the costs of energy will continue to increase in the near future.
To deal with such a situation in a responsible way, electricity rates must be raised in Taiwan.
It is only by doing so that costs could be covered and that Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) could function in a sustainable way.
Taipower has been experiencing deficits for two years. Despite an electricity subsidy of NT$50 billion (US$1.58 billion) from the government, the company’s losses still reached NT$198.5 billion last year.
As such, electricity rates should be modified in accordance with the costs.
Reasonable rates would also help the public understand what it takes to use electricity, which might lead to lower energy usage and a reduction in carbon emissions.
However, the public might have a hard time accepting this increase in electricity prices.
The government could take the initiative to impose an “energy tax,” requiring all users of electricity to pay a certain amount.
This tax should be based on the principle of “those who pollute the environment more should pay more.”
It would be imposed on the sources of power generation systems and the tax would be based on the amount of carbon emissions.
To be specific, it is the private companies that collaborate with Taipower that should be taxed.
This would help the public understand more about electricity rates and debunk the myth that renewable energy is more expensive.
The tax energy policy might also encourage the more efficient usage of electricity, reducing costs.
When raising electricity prices, the government should take certain groups of people, such as the disadvantaged and small business owners, into consideration and do their best to mitigate the impact on them.
For larger companies and those who consume more electricity, the government should make it clear that they must pay more.
Those who use more electricity should not be subsidized.
The government should not go against the grain of social justice by robbing the poor and assisting the rich.
Dino Wei is an information engineer in Yilan County.
Translated by Emma Liu
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS