What could Apple have done with the humble vehicle?
Ideas, some credible and others less so, have dripped out for a decade. For a time, the company was rumored to be working on something small based on BMW AG’s i3. Then it was said to actually be a van. With augmented reality, a new kind of battery and smart seat belts.
Reports suggested a desire to leapfrog Tesla Inc and go straight to full self-driving — and it was granted permission to test its technology on California roads. It was looking at building charging infrastructure. So insatiable was the appetite for any news on the car, Apple watchers had started to pay attention to the kinds of vehicles bought by Apple executives to see whether there were any signs as to their tastes and the project’s probable direction.
My favorite report of all was that Apple had looked into a deal with McLaren Group Ltd, signaling the Apple car might one day be a true super car. A British one, no less. I could just picture it making its debut in a Bond movie: a tuxedoed Daniel Craig flirting with Siri to open the door to let him out.
Alas, we would never know what could have been. Apple’s decision to scrap its car project, according to reporting from Bloomberg News’ Mark Gurman, brings everyone’s favorite Silicon Valley rumor to an anticlimactic, but sadly predictable end. Apple’s presence on our roads would remain limited to CarPlay, its in-car software. Some of the company’s 2,000 workers on the project — named “Titan” — are to be reassigned to work on artificial intelligence (AI), Gurman wrote.
Others would have to apply for other positions; some are to be laid off.
In this era of cost-cutting across the tech business, the Apple Car was a distraction that could no longer be justified, not when the needs of AI must take priority, with Apple seen as a laggard. Indeed, that Apple should bother making a car was always a difficult sell at the best of times. The large margins it enjoys on its hardware could not possibly be replicated, and the ordeal of putting a vehicle into production would have daunted even Apple CEO Tim Cook, for whom complex supply chains are a speciality. The initial struggles of Tesla, and costly abandonments of other car projects, such as Dyson Ltd’s, would have always been front of mind — and slowing growth in the sector made pushing ahead an even bigger risk.
Indecision over the road the Apple Car should have taken seemed to be at the root of its problems. Leadership changes were frequent. Big-name former Tesla executive Doug Field joined Apple only to leave for Ford three years later. Project Titan was a project troubled — an unkind take is that the company has thrown billions of dollars down the drain through mismanagement and a lack of clear vision. Then again, Apple’s share price would rise handsomely whenever there was even a slither of news about the car’s existence — and it would not fall back when those rumors failed to materialize. Details of the project’s cancellation barely moved the company’s stock when reported on Tuesday.
Despite the news, I suspect that there would always be rumors of an Apple Car being worked on somewhere in the bowels of Cupertino or some mystery location. Hazy details would be spoken about the same way we speculate about specimens at Area 51, or the whereabouts of Lord Lucan. However, any expectations that something would hit the road before the end of this decade have now been dashed. The Apple Car, sadly, is canceled.
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into