Russian President Vladimir Putin wants the world to believe that his nation’s economy is doing fine and that he has the wherewithal to prosecute the war in Ukraine indefinitely.
He is bluffing.
His aggression is costing him dearly and the West should exploit this vulnerability to the fullest.
Before invading Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, Putin had painstakingly built Russia’s fiscal and financial defenses, a crucial element of his own grasp on power. At just 16 percent of GDP, sovereign debt was among the smallest of any nation. In the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russian government was already running a budget surplus — in contrast to large and persistent deficits in the US and Europe. It had accumulated a US$175 billion “national well-being” fund and more than US$500 billion in international reserves at its central bank. The largest banks were well capitalized compared with their global peers.
Now, Putin has radically changed course to fund the war and to prop up the economy amid Western sanctions. Military spending has gone from 3.6 percent of GDP in 2021 to an estimated 7.1 percent, boosting production of everything from artillery shells to computers. Soldiers’ salaries and death benefits have lifted the fortunes of the poorest families. More than US$130 billion in subsidized loans have enabled Russians to splurge on new apartments, contributing to a boom in construction.
As a result, real GDP growth rebounded to 3.6 percent last year, defying predictions of a protracted recession.
Yet the limits to such “military Keynesianism” are already evident. The war’s consumption of able-bodied workers has driven the unemployment rate to an extreme low of 2.9 percent, forcing civilian industries to pay more for scarce labor. To keep inflation in check, the central bank has had to hike its benchmark interest rate to 16 percent, further squeezing the private sector. Military spending will not keep adding to GDP growth: Just maintaining it at the current level would require big sacrifices in other important areas, such as social spending and much-needed infrastructure maintenance.
Without the war-related stimulus, Russia’s economic performance would look much less impressive.
Worse for Putin, he is rapidly eroding the defenses he constructed to protect the economy and himself from unexpected shocks. Much of the central bank’s reserves are frozen in the West. The National Well-being Fund’s liquid assets have declined by nearly half since the beginning of the war to about US$55 billion. The government is running an annual budget deficit of about US$17 billion and its borrowing capacity is of limited use if domestic banks are the only available lenders. Those same banks are increasingly exposed to losses as sky-high interest rates weigh on corporate borrowers.
The West has its own financial difficulties, of course. In the US and Europe, governments need to get budget deficits and rising sovereign debts under control. This will require tough choices, but the temporary spending required to support Ukraine is far from decisive. Taken together, NATO members’ fiscal resources are more than 20 times greater than Russia’s. On average, EU members spend about 2 percent of GDP on defense.
This war will almost certainly end in negotiation. For the West, the goal should be to ensure the most secure and independent Ukrainian state possible — and to deter others from attempting similar land grabs. To that end, it should make the most of Putin’s economic vulnerability, including by tightening sanctions and arming Ukraine. Given the political will, Western nations have ample resources to outlast him — an advantage they should use to stop the bloodshed as soon as feasible.
The Bloomberg editorial board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s