Indonesia’s general election, held on Valentine’s Day, garnered global attention as one of the largest democratic exercises worldwide, and a monumental display of democratic practice. The participation of the Indonesian diaspora, including those in Taiwan, underscored the significance of practicing democracy beyond national borders.
The Indonesian General Elections Commission (KPU) faced the daunting task of ensuring a fair, transparent and efficient election among the vast diaspora. Conducting overseas elections in Taiwan is fraught with many challenges, requiring meticulous preparations and personnel to uphold democratic integrity.
The diaspora in Taiwan, comprising about 270,000 people, presented a significant challenge. To address this, the KPU established the Overseas Voting Organizing Group to oversee the process.
Indonesians could select postal voting or direct voting, with about 170,000 registering to use the former. For direct voting, a network of 54 polling stations and six mobile ballot boxes were set up across Taiwan. Each station was staffed with dedicated officers and supervisors selected through a rigorous recruitment process. A requirement that electoral staff have no political party affiliation for five years guarantees impartiality and integrity.
The diversity of the diaspora — which includes migrant workers, students and professionals — necessitated tailored approaches to voter outreach and education. The KPU provided technical guidance and comprehensive training programs to equip electoral staff with the skills and knowledge essential for effectively executing their duties.
This year’s election faced formidable challenges, notably logistical hurdles coinciding with the Lunar New Year holiday in Taiwan and concerns regarding the use of mobile applications. These obstacles tested the resilience and credibility of the process, prompting scrutiny and calls for improvements.
Coordinating the movement of personnel and ballots amid holiday festivities strained logistical capabilities. Addressing unforeseen circumstances required meticulous planning and coordination.
Meanwhile, the technology used for data aggregation and transmission encountered technical glitches, leading to delays and discrepancies in reporting results. Most importantly, the security and reliability concerns of the application raised doubts about the credibility and impartiality of the electoral process, undermining public trust in the KPU.
The failure to effectively address logistical hurdles risks disenfranchising voters and undermining the legitimacy of election outcomes. Similarly, the use of technology, which was marred by instability and inefficiency, raises concerns about infrastructure reliability, transparency, accountability and its susceptibility to fraud.
Indonesia’s overseas elections in Taiwan exemplify the intricate interplay between democracy, governance and diaspora engagement. Despite inherent challenges, meticulous preparations and steadfast commitment to democratic principles ensured the success of the elections.
Through the dedication of personnel and robust infrastructure, Indonesia reaffirmed its commitment to democratic governance. Continuous improvements in electoral practices will enhance the foundation of democracy, fostering greater participation and inclusivity. Despite encountering obstacles, the resilience and adaptability of the electoral process offers valuable lessons for holding elections. By prioritizing transparency, accountability and public trust, Indonesia can navigate those challenges and bolster the foundation of democracy at home and abroad.
Yenny Chandra is a doctoral candidate in the International Doctoral Program in Asia-Pacific Studies at National Chengchi University.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
RSS