Indonesia’s general election, held on Valentine’s Day, garnered global attention as one of the largest democratic exercises worldwide, and a monumental display of democratic practice. The participation of the Indonesian diaspora, including those in Taiwan, underscored the significance of practicing democracy beyond national borders.
The Indonesian General Elections Commission (KPU) faced the daunting task of ensuring a fair, transparent and efficient election among the vast diaspora. Conducting overseas elections in Taiwan is fraught with many challenges, requiring meticulous preparations and personnel to uphold democratic integrity.
The diaspora in Taiwan, comprising about 270,000 people, presented a significant challenge. To address this, the KPU established the Overseas Voting Organizing Group to oversee the process.
Indonesians could select postal voting or direct voting, with about 170,000 registering to use the former. For direct voting, a network of 54 polling stations and six mobile ballot boxes were set up across Taiwan. Each station was staffed with dedicated officers and supervisors selected through a rigorous recruitment process. A requirement that electoral staff have no political party affiliation for five years guarantees impartiality and integrity.
The diversity of the diaspora — which includes migrant workers, students and professionals — necessitated tailored approaches to voter outreach and education. The KPU provided technical guidance and comprehensive training programs to equip electoral staff with the skills and knowledge essential for effectively executing their duties.
This year’s election faced formidable challenges, notably logistical hurdles coinciding with the Lunar New Year holiday in Taiwan and concerns regarding the use of mobile applications. These obstacles tested the resilience and credibility of the process, prompting scrutiny and calls for improvements.
Coordinating the movement of personnel and ballots amid holiday festivities strained logistical capabilities. Addressing unforeseen circumstances required meticulous planning and coordination.
Meanwhile, the technology used for data aggregation and transmission encountered technical glitches, leading to delays and discrepancies in reporting results. Most importantly, the security and reliability concerns of the application raised doubts about the credibility and impartiality of the electoral process, undermining public trust in the KPU.
The failure to effectively address logistical hurdles risks disenfranchising voters and undermining the legitimacy of election outcomes. Similarly, the use of technology, which was marred by instability and inefficiency, raises concerns about infrastructure reliability, transparency, accountability and its susceptibility to fraud.
Indonesia’s overseas elections in Taiwan exemplify the intricate interplay between democracy, governance and diaspora engagement. Despite inherent challenges, meticulous preparations and steadfast commitment to democratic principles ensured the success of the elections.
Through the dedication of personnel and robust infrastructure, Indonesia reaffirmed its commitment to democratic governance. Continuous improvements in electoral practices will enhance the foundation of democracy, fostering greater participation and inclusivity. Despite encountering obstacles, the resilience and adaptability of the electoral process offers valuable lessons for holding elections. By prioritizing transparency, accountability and public trust, Indonesia can navigate those challenges and bolster the foundation of democracy at home and abroad.
Yenny Chandra is a doctoral candidate in the International Doctoral Program in Asia-Pacific Studies at National Chengchi University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS