The capsizing of a Chinese boat fleeing the coast guard off Kinmen on Feb. 14 has increased cross-strait tensions. Chinese civilian vessels intruding into other country’s restricted waters, part of Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics, have created new potential flash points that escalate disputes and set up risky confrontations in international waters.
In the Kinmen incident, the Chinese boat lacked registration information and proper documentation. Two of its four-member crew died when it capsized. Although the fishers’ families and the coast guard have given different accounts of what happened, the incident is unlikely to escalate into a military conflict. Both sides of the Taiwan Strait have so far shown restraint and sought to resolve the matter in accordance with judicial probe.
Nevertheless, it is unsurprising that Beijing has used the case to further reject the legitimacy of Taiwan’s restricted areas in the Strait, while the China Coast Guard announced it would increase patrols in waters near Kinmen County. That move is obviously part of a deliberate strategy to claim it controls the area to change the “status quo” in the Strait. China has long sought to expand its “gray zone” tactics in international waters to further its ambitious expansionist agenda. Aside from its deployment of military jets and ships across the Strait’s median line, China has encouraged private vessels, such as fishing boats and dredgers, to illegally enter Taiwan’s waters. Those incursions have significantly affected the area’s marine resources, and are intended to test Taiwan’s ability to defend its territory.
From 2016 to last year, the Coast Guard Administration drove off more than 9,100 Chinese fishing boats that illegally entered Taiwan’s restricted waters, stopping 400 vessels and expropriating 80, agency data show. From 2008 to 2016, under former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the coast guard detained more than 10,856 illegal Chinese boats. Under President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), the coast guard seized only 403, showing more prudence to maintain steady and peaceful order in the Strait.
The Chinese intrusions contravene the UN Convention on the Law of Sea, under which the 160km-wide Taiwan Strait — at its narrowest point — has been defined as international waters, with China and Taiwan each drawing 24 nautical miles (44.4km) of restricted territory off each other’s coasts.
China’s “gray zone” activities have not only targeted Taiwan, but have long and increasingly been used in the East and South China seas and the Pacific Ocean to aggressively expand its territory in international waters with the use of its civilian fishing boats, which have been dubbed China’s “maritime militia.” Hundreds of Chinese civilian boats, which are often accompanied by Chinese warships, frequently gather to assert China’s jurisdictional claims in the South China Sea, leading to escalating disputes and confrontations between Chinese and Philippine forces. South Korean reports showed that it has detained at least 1,704 Chinese fishing boats illegally entering its restricted waters between 2016 and 2019.
While illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing is a worldwide problem, Chinese fishing vessels have also become an issue for the US, Japan, India and Australia.
China is expected to increase its coast guard patrols in waters near Taiwan’s outlying islands to further pressure president-elect William Lai (賴清德), who is to take office in May. As Lai has vowed to thoroughly study the Kinmen case and allocate more personnel and resources to improve the coast guard’s law enforcement capabilities, Taiwan should accelerate maritime cooperation with neighboring countries, not only to enhance its ability to confront illegal incursions, but also to show the region that cross-strait disputes are of international concern. China’s attempts to unilaterally challenge the “status quo” in the region might force countries to join forces to push back against Beijing’s ambitions.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS