It is not ‘Taoyuan, China’
The Taoyuan Lantern Festival, which began on Feb. 21, was originally intended to be an event for Taoyuan residents to welcome tourists from across the country. Surprisingly, a promotional video introduced it as the Taoyuan Lantern Festival in “Taiwan, China.”
One of the event organizers was the same company that hosted the “Xitang Hanfu (漢服) Culture Week” in China’s Xitang Ancient Town last year. As a result, the festival was filled with ancient costumes from the Tang, Song and Ming dynasties, adding Chinese “flavor” to the event.
When the Taoyuan City Government approached the event organizer, did it tell them that this was a Taiwan, Republic of China festival, not a People’s Republic of China festival?
Did it object to any belittling of Taiwan?
If the government had made this clear and stuck to its stance, how would any of the contractors have dared to use “Taiwan, China” in a promotional video?
Given that the Taoyuan Lantern Festival cost taxpayers NT$49 million (US$1.6 million), should the Taoyuan City Government authorities have examined the promotional videos more closely to make sure that they were in line with the intent of the festival?
Did they know that such a video would anger the Taiwanese, who might question whether Taoyuan Mayor Simon Chang’s (張善政) administration has been infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?
Are city authorities not worried that the Taiwanese would feel that their city has been downgraded to another link in the chain of CCP’s “united front”?
My concerns are not groundless.
On the eve of the Lunar New Year this year, the Taoyuan City Government launched the “Taoyuan Yexiao Street” (桃園夜宵街).
However, how many Taiwanese know what “yexiao” is? It is a Chinese Mandarin term for late-night snacks, called “xiaoye” in Taiwan.
At that time, some questioned why Chang used the Chinese term “yexiao” and now that the Taoyuan Lantern Festival boldly displayed the word “Taiwan, China,” one has to ask whether he considers himself a mayor of Taiwan or China.
I would like to ask Chang: “What is the connection between the Taoyuan Lantern Festival and the Han costumes and the ancient rituals of the Song, Ming and Qing dynasties?”
Taoyuan is rich in local culture, such as Hakka and new immigrant cultures, as well as infrastructure and development, possessing an international airport and a fishing harbor.
The event would be closer to Taoyuan residents’ life experiences and expectations if the lantern festival had been organized around these local characteristics.
We should return the lantern festival to Taoyuan, Taiwan, and to the people of Taoyuan — we refuse to be belittled by the CCP.
Hsin Na
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS