It is not ‘Taoyuan, China’
The Taoyuan Lantern Festival, which began on Feb. 21, was originally intended to be an event for Taoyuan residents to welcome tourists from across the country. Surprisingly, a promotional video introduced it as the Taoyuan Lantern Festival in “Taiwan, China.”
One of the event organizers was the same company that hosted the “Xitang Hanfu (漢服) Culture Week” in China’s Xitang Ancient Town last year. As a result, the festival was filled with ancient costumes from the Tang, Song and Ming dynasties, adding Chinese “flavor” to the event.
When the Taoyuan City Government approached the event organizer, did it tell them that this was a Taiwan, Republic of China festival, not a People’s Republic of China festival?
Did it object to any belittling of Taiwan?
If the government had made this clear and stuck to its stance, how would any of the contractors have dared to use “Taiwan, China” in a promotional video?
Given that the Taoyuan Lantern Festival cost taxpayers NT$49 million (US$1.6 million), should the Taoyuan City Government authorities have examined the promotional videos more closely to make sure that they were in line with the intent of the festival?
Did they know that such a video would anger the Taiwanese, who might question whether Taoyuan Mayor Simon Chang’s (張善政) administration has been infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?
Are city authorities not worried that the Taiwanese would feel that their city has been downgraded to another link in the chain of CCP’s “united front”?
My concerns are not groundless.
On the eve of the Lunar New Year this year, the Taoyuan City Government launched the “Taoyuan Yexiao Street” (桃園夜宵街).
However, how many Taiwanese know what “yexiao” is? It is a Chinese Mandarin term for late-night snacks, called “xiaoye” in Taiwan.
At that time, some questioned why Chang used the Chinese term “yexiao” and now that the Taoyuan Lantern Festival boldly displayed the word “Taiwan, China,” one has to ask whether he considers himself a mayor of Taiwan or China.
I would like to ask Chang: “What is the connection between the Taoyuan Lantern Festival and the Han costumes and the ancient rituals of the Song, Ming and Qing dynasties?”
Taoyuan is rich in local culture, such as Hakka and new immigrant cultures, as well as infrastructure and development, possessing an international airport and a fishing harbor.
The event would be closer to Taoyuan residents’ life experiences and expectations if the lantern festival had been organized around these local characteristics.
We should return the lantern festival to Taoyuan, Taiwan, and to the people of Taoyuan — we refuse to be belittled by the CCP.
Hsin Na
Taipei
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS