Newly elected legislators reported to the Legislative Yuan on Feb. 1 and held their first official meeting on Tuesday, but its disoriented state has highlighted new legislators’ inexperience.
The legislative election last month resulted in none of the major political parties holding more than half of the total 113 seats — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won 52, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won 51, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) won eight, and two independent seats are held by KMT-friendly legislators. This means that negotiations between parties would be crucial to passing legislation.
With KMT legislator-at-large Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) becoming the new legislative speaker, 54 of the 113 seats are also taken by newcomers, with 34 from the KMT, leading to an unpredictable future for the legislature. Despite this, many political observers held a positive outlook, saying that new voices could bring a fresh atmosphere to the legislature.
However, the run-up to Tuesday’s meeting suggests that the KMT and TPP caucuses are unfamiliar with the Legislative Yuan’s procedural rules. KMT caucus convener Fu Kun-chi on Feb. 7 issued a press release petitioning for an extraordinary meeting for Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) to report on Feb. 17 regarding cimbuterol found in pork in Taichung — despite political parties’ agreement on Feb. 5 to have the first meeting on Tuesday.
Citing the Constitution on the holding of biannual legislative sessions between February and May and between September and December, and extraordinary sessions being called at other times, the DPP caucus questioned why the KMT would call an extraordinary session during an official session period.
The KMT caucus on Feb. 15 urged Han to hold consultations the next day regarding Chen. Han’s office refused, saying that consultations would be held a day prior to the previously agreed opening meeting. Recognizing his ignorance of the law and legislative procedure, Fu on Feb. 17 appeared to shift the blame by saying that the press release was a “typographical error” made by a party worker, who would be punished.
Confusion continued on Monday last week as the TPP caucus rejected the KMT’s proposal to have Chen’s food safety report a day later, but sent an urgent notice later the same day to the DPP and KMT caucuses asking them to attend negotiations in less than an hour. Negotiations failed as the notice was too short.
The KMT caucus’ legislators also proposed a change to the meeting agenda early on Tuesday, asking Chen to make a food safety report before his general policy address, but withdrew the proposal two hours later, saying that it supported the TPP’s proposal.
The first meeting on Tuesday opened in a chaos, as the KMT staged a boycott of Chen’s general policy address by swarming the podium. Pushing and yelling occurred when a new DPP legislator tried to snatch new KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang’s (羅智強) microphone.
Responding to the turmoil, Han called for a 10-minute break and urged lawmakers to “consider policies rationally” and “maintain order in the chamber” before resuming the session. The food safety report on Friday was also disrupted by Han a few times, asking for “mutual respect among legislators and government officials” to share the 15-minute Q&A time, as a few new KMT legislators refused to let Chen speak.
It is understandable that new legislators would want to prove their worth and raise their profile, but as lawmakers, legislators should first familiarize themselves with the Constitution, laws and legislative procedures.
The new legislative caucuses and legislators must also put their political stunts aside and step up their game. They should focus on more pressing issues or important bills concerning the public, such as monitoring the widespread tainted chili powder instead of the seemingly isolated case of tainted pork, rather than getting caught up in trivial political debates on basic procedural rules and letting voters’ expectations down.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS