‘Internet celebrity’ chaos
Taiwanese influencers Chen Neng-chuan (陳能釧) and Lu Tsu-hsien (魯祖顯) staged an assault and kidnapping in a Cambodian “scam compound” during a live broadcast earlier this month and then claimed to have escaped the next day.
Chen, known as “Goodnight Chicken” (晚安小雞) and Lu, who goes by the handle “a-Now” (阿鬧), were arrested by the Cambodian police on Feb. 14 for fabricating the incident.
They were sentenced to two years in prison and ordered to pay a fine for “incitement to discriminate” and making false statements.
Internet celebrities have become very popular in recent years.
Their unrestricted broadcasts and vulgar language are often unpleasant to the ear, but their antics attract many fans. The rule of law has failed to penalize or restrict such disorderly behavior.
Some of them are even linked to politicians and continue to cause trouble on the Internet.
Internet celebrities seem to enjoy a high degree of freedom of speech and freedom of conduct in Taiwan’s society and online community.
The chaos of this cultural phenomenon has existed for quite some time and has been casting a shadow over Taiwanese society.
However, this time, the major setback of “Goodnight Chicken” and “a-Now” has served as a great reminder and an alternative experience for similar Taiwanese agencies.
Hopefully, the government would take the Internet celebrity chaos seriously, amend the law and use its public power, so people would not think that the rule of law in Taiwan is inferior to that of Cambodia.
Tao Yi-che
New Taipei City
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS