Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) on Tuesday called for rationality in dealing with the security of Kinmen County amid heightened cross-strait tensions following the death of two Chinese last week.
The two men died when their speedboat capsized during a pursuit by a Coast Guard Administration vessel after it had entered the nation’s restricted waters.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) denied the legitimacy of the restricted zone and said the deaths had angered the Chinese public.
“The mainland reserves the right to take further measures and Taiwan will bear all consequences,” TAO spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) said on Saturday.
Over the past week, China’s coast guard vessels have increased patrols along the zone’s perimeter and have boarded a Taiwanese tourist vessel. The situation is concerning, because Beijing does not recognize the zone, which was defined unilaterally in 1992 to help protect Taiwanese fishers.
Chinese vessels regularly make incursions in waters near Taiwan’s outlying islands — for example, to engage in illegal fishing or dredging.
China could easily use an incident such as the deaths of the fishers as a pretext to invade Kinmen.
In an article titled “T-Day: The Battle for Taiwan” published by Reuters on Nov. 5, 2021, which analyzed ways in which a Taiwan-China military conflict could unfold, one scenario described China’s annexation of one or more of the nation’s outlying islands.
Another report published by Bloomberg on Nov. 5 last year suggested that China could take Kinmen “perhaps by using subterfuge such as a supposed humanitarian crisis to put its forces ashore.”
Taking Kinmen would allow China to gauge the nation’s resolve and defense capabilities, put it closer to an attempted invasion and potentially affect the morale of the nation’s military and public.
The US might not intervene to defend Kinmen and, if so, would find itself in a precarious situation. It would be pressured to confirm a commitment to the defense of Taiwan proper and failure to do so would be seen by many in Taiwan as abandonment, which China would most certainly use to its advantage.
Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) on Wednesday told reporters that affairs related to Kinmen’s restricted waters fall under the jurisdiction of the Coast Guard Administration and that the military would not intervene to prevent matters from escalating.
That is not the message the military should be sending. What the public needs to hear is that the military would resolutely defend the nation’s sovereignty and its people. The nation must be prepared to move assets to Kinmen and Lienchiang County as needed.
Foreign Affairs magazine on Friday last week cited US policy experts as saying that a Chinese takeover of Taiwan would be a geopolitical catastrophe for the US and its allies.
Taiwan proper is strategically valuable, as it “anchors Japan’s defense and denies China a springboard from which it could threaten US allies in the western Pacific,” former US deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger and others said.
“Taiwan’s annexation in the face of US inaction or ineffective action would present US allies in Asia and Europe with a nightmare they have never faced before: Washington proving unable to protect a polity that is an ally in all but name,” they said.
Given the potential for events off the coast of Kinmen to spiral out of control, the government should seek assurance of the US’ commitment to defend the nation. This would be in the US’ interest and would imbue Taiwanese with confidence that could spur the reforms its military so desperately needs.
Taipei and Washington should view events in Kinmen with the utmost concern — particularly Chinese actions such as balloons it is floating over Taiwan proper and the redrawing of a commercial flight route.
The government should prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
EDITORIAL CARTOON
RSS