The early release of once-fugitive former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra represents to many a deal the influential billionaire made with his enemies to counter an even greater threat to the royalist-military establishment.
To some observers of Thailand’s convoluted politics, Thaksin’s parole after returning from self-imposed exile in August last year was the latest act in an elaborate effort to crush the hugely popular anti-establishment Move Forward party that finished first in last year’s election.
Move Forward, which advocates institutional reforms including some involving the monarchy, was blocked from forming a government by a Senate appointed by a junta that seized power in 2014 coup against a government led by Thaksin’s Pheu Thai party.
Three months later, Pheu Thai — which during the election campaign had shared Move Forward’s platform of ending military dominance of politics — formed its own coalition government that included some of the very figures involved in the 2014 coup.
The same day, Thaksin, 74, flew back to Thailand on a private jet and surrendered to authorities on various criminal convictions in absentia. He complained of chest pains and was transferred to a police hospital, where he remained until Sunday, the first day he was eligible for parole.
“His comeback has to do with the deal he made with the establishment,” said Titipol Phakdeewanich, a political scientist at Thailand’s Ubon Ratchathani University.
Reuters requests for comments on Monday went unanswered. Thaksin’s family, party and Thai authorities all say there was no such quid pro quo, but many analysts are unconvinced.
One reason is that while Thaksin’s pro-business agenda posed challenges to Thailand’s patronage system, Move Forward’s anti-establishment proposals went much further.
The party even dared to propose amending (but not abolishing) Thailand’s strict laws against criticising the monarchy that carry penalties of up to 15 years in prison.
“Thaksin is flexible, he’s a dealmaker,” Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow for Southeast Asia Joshua Kurlantzik said. “He’s much less of an existential threat than Move Forward, and he’s shown that now by almost surely making a deal … and then doing what the establishment wants.”
Thaksin himself was once seen as the biggest threat to Thailand’s establishment — a loose alliance of the military and entrenched business elites who often cite as their ultimate legitimacy their loyalty to the monarchy, considered sacrosanct by many and commanded by the constitution to be upheld in reverence.
When Thaksin burst onto the political scene with his populist party to win elections in 2001, he expanded spending on healthcare, rural development and farming subsidies, but was soon accused of corruption, carrying out extrajudicial killings in a controversial drug war and amassing a personal power base.
Crucially, he also faced accusations that he was undermining the monarchy, which he denied. On Monday, Thaksin met prosecutors to discuss a years-old royal insult complaint.
In 2006, the military leveraged middle-class anger and mass demonstrations to stage a bloodless coup when Thaksin was abroad, but his loyalists kept winning elections.
More than a decade of pro-Thaksin “Red Shirt” and anti-Thaksin “Yellow Shirt” protests paralysed Thailand until the 2014 coup — also against a pro-Thaksin government.
Two things changed to allow Thaksin the opening to return, analysts say.
The first was the strong showing in the vote of Move Forward’s predecessor in the 2019 elections, which nevertheless resulted in a government dominated by military-allied parties because of the junta-appointed Senate’s votes.
After that party, called Future Forward, was dissolved by a court ruling, its founder banned from politics and charged with royal insult, student protests in 2020 began to spread — eventually swelling to tens of thousands.
Unlike other protest movements, the students began openly questioning some long-held underpinnings of Thai society — including the military repeatedly seizing power in the name of protecting the crown.
Later, some even criticised the king himself. Scores of those protesters have since been prosecuted under lese-majeste laws.
However, the open questioning of some of Thailand’s most traditional institutions could not be undone and even made it onto the political platform of the reconstituted Move Forward in last year’s elections.
When Move Forward won the most seats in those elections, it led to months of deadlock in parliament. The military-appointed Senate, as expected, refused to vote in a Move Forward-led government. No other political party would join Move Forward — citing its stated willingness to even consider changing laws protecting the monarchy.
Move Forward’s refusal to abandon its proposal to amend the royal insults law outraged conservatives and military-backed lawmakers closed ranks to prevent it from forming a government.
Analysts pointed to the fact that Thaksin did not spend a single night in prison as an indicator some kind of deal was likely made during those months.
“Thaksin needed the help of the ‘establishment’ to return to Thailand without going to prison,” Naresuan University Center of ASEAN Community Studies senior adviser Paul Chambers said.
“The establishment needed Thaksin’s Pheu Thai party to help prevent the Move Forward party from coming to office without having to resort to another military coup,” he said.
Political analyst Thitinan Pongsudhirak said the newly organised establishment had effectively co-opted its one-time enemy to prevent the rise of another.
“Thaksin now has become more like a pawn rather than a mastermind,” he said.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s