The recent passing of human rights lawyer and former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator-at-large candidate Chen Chun-han (陳俊翰) has sparked widespread grief across political parties and throughout Taiwan.
After the official announcement of Chen’s death, the DPP, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) all vowed to carry on his legacy of protecting the rights of people with disabilities.
Living with spinal muscular atrophy, Chen was paralyzed from the neck down for the majority of his life. Despite the adversity, his lifelong advocacy for the availability of advanced medications had successfully attracted attention from society and raised awareness.
He became renowned as the “Taiwanese Extraordinary Attorney,” a name inspired by the South Korean TV series Extraordinary Attorney Woo, due to his unrelenting efforts.
The appearance of Chen’s name on the DPP’s list of legislator-at-large candidates in November last year triggered a wide discussion. Many people afflicted with rare diseases were optimistic that his presence in the Legislative Yuan would allow their voices to be heard and enhance the overall medical situation of the country.
Chen hoped to legislate for the construction of a more exhaustive medical insurance system for these patients, contending that the government needs to thoroughly revise the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法). Unfortunately, Chen failed to enter the legislature to push for the necessary reforms.
Lawyer Chen’s dedication to advocating for better medical treatments was indeed impressive, which made some wonder why he decided to return to Taiwan when he could have been a well-paid lawyer in the US.
In response, he said that while he could have enjoyed adequate medical insurance coverage for his disease in the US, he aspired to improve the lives of more patients in similar circumstances by making use of the knowledge he had acquired abroad.
His altruistic character has ignited the hope of countless patients and prompted cross-party politicians to collaboratively propose relevant bills to fulfill the needs of these people.
The DPP, KMT and TPP immediately offered condolences to Chen’s family upon the announcement of his death on Feb. 15. The KMT lauded Chen’s ability to overcome his illness to obtain a double major in accounting and law, while the TPP highlighted its respect for his determination to fight for the rights of the disabled. Both parties also promised to foster social equality that will genuinely transcend physical differences.
Chen’s endeavors are widely acknowledged, but most people overlook the significant contribution of his mother, who had always been an unsung hero behind the scenes.
Since his diagnosis at the age of one, she had been by his side and taken exceptional care of his health in spite of his severe physical limitations. In appreciation of her unconditional love, Chen once said that he would not have topped his bar examination and been able to explore the world without her unwavering assistance.
Chen’s mother and her tenacity undoubtedly deserves more recognition for her son’s accomplishments.
Chen was truly a selfless warrior who managed to transform his weaknesses into incredible strength. With his constant perseverance and the infinite support of his mother, they have proven that it is possible to attain goals that seem beyond our capabilities. Hopefully, in this new legislative term, the three parties could set aside their differences and strive to collectively actualize his unfinished dream.
Tshua Siu-ui is a Taiwanese student studying international relations and politics in Norwich, England.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS