Fake news a threat to all
In this era of information overload, news media play a critical role in shaping public opinion. However, when fake news becomes a national propaganda tool, its influence is startling.
Research in the past few years shows a shocking reality: More than 100 Web sites are spreading fake news in Europe, Latin America and Asia — and are doing so in the service of the Chinese government, disseminating disinformation with a pro-Beijing bent.
The Web sites are not merely elements of information warfare, but part of a spirited strategy and full-scale cross-border fake news production line. The goal is to shape China’s international image while smearing political rivals, particularly the US and its allies.
This not only threatens the free-flow of factual information, but challenges the foundations of democratic societies.
Research from Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto shows that Shenzhen, China-based Haimaiyunxiang Media Co is behind the 100-site network. On the surface, Haimaiyunxiang appears to be a marketing firm, but behind the curtains is the Chinese government and its digital influence activities. The scope of these efforts include more than 30 countries across Eurasia and Latin America. This has been nicknamed the “media great wall.”
At government direction and with civic implementation, this model shows how China is manipulating global information, attempting to shape international public discourse.
The tactics used by these fake news sites are varied, including creating what appear to be legitimate news sites, publishing articles in local languages that includes real information to raise the believability of their articles.
The strategy ensures that fake information could be picked up by local media, which in turn would influence public opinion and attitudes in Beijing’s favor.
Some of the content used is derived from conspiracy theories, such as blaming the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US. This is just one of several common tactics used by the news sites.
The Chinese government-sponsored dissemination campaign not only creates a threat to target countries’ governments and social stability, but also harms the health of the global information ecosystem, with potentially far-reaching long-term consequences, such as the erosion of trust and social stability.
When it becomes difficult to discern real news from fake news, public trust is sure to wear away. The foundations of democratic systems — the power of citizens to make choices based on real information — could also be challenged.
A joint response from international society is needed to tackle the threat of cross-border fake news. Such efforts should include campaigns to increase people’s ability to discern fake news from real news, and bolster the sharing and cooperation of international news outlets, as well as implement severe sanctions against distributors of fake news.
Only through international cooperation and joint efforts could we guarantee the flow of factual information and safeguard the foundations of democratic societies.
Chueh Li
Taipei
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS