Fake news a threat to all
In this era of information overload, news media play a critical role in shaping public opinion. However, when fake news becomes a national propaganda tool, its influence is startling.
Research in the past few years shows a shocking reality: More than 100 Web sites are spreading fake news in Europe, Latin America and Asia — and are doing so in the service of the Chinese government, disseminating disinformation with a pro-Beijing bent.
The Web sites are not merely elements of information warfare, but part of a spirited strategy and full-scale cross-border fake news production line. The goal is to shape China’s international image while smearing political rivals, particularly the US and its allies.
This not only threatens the free-flow of factual information, but challenges the foundations of democratic societies.
Research from Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto shows that Shenzhen, China-based Haimaiyunxiang Media Co is behind the 100-site network. On the surface, Haimaiyunxiang appears to be a marketing firm, but behind the curtains is the Chinese government and its digital influence activities. The scope of these efforts include more than 30 countries across Eurasia and Latin America. This has been nicknamed the “media great wall.”
At government direction and with civic implementation, this model shows how China is manipulating global information, attempting to shape international public discourse.
The tactics used by these fake news sites are varied, including creating what appear to be legitimate news sites, publishing articles in local languages that includes real information to raise the believability of their articles.
The strategy ensures that fake information could be picked up by local media, which in turn would influence public opinion and attitudes in Beijing’s favor.
Some of the content used is derived from conspiracy theories, such as blaming the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US. This is just one of several common tactics used by the news sites.
The Chinese government-sponsored dissemination campaign not only creates a threat to target countries’ governments and social stability, but also harms the health of the global information ecosystem, with potentially far-reaching long-term consequences, such as the erosion of trust and social stability.
When it becomes difficult to discern real news from fake news, public trust is sure to wear away. The foundations of democratic systems — the power of citizens to make choices based on real information — could also be challenged.
A joint response from international society is needed to tackle the threat of cross-border fake news. Such efforts should include campaigns to increase people’s ability to discern fake news from real news, and bolster the sharing and cooperation of international news outlets, as well as implement severe sanctions against distributors of fake news.
Only through international cooperation and joint efforts could we guarantee the flow of factual information and safeguard the foundations of democratic societies.
Chueh Li
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS