Fake news a threat to all
In this era of information overload, news media play a critical role in shaping public opinion. However, when fake news becomes a national propaganda tool, its influence is startling.
Research in the past few years shows a shocking reality: More than 100 Web sites are spreading fake news in Europe, Latin America and Asia — and are doing so in the service of the Chinese government, disseminating disinformation with a pro-Beijing bent.
The Web sites are not merely elements of information warfare, but part of a spirited strategy and full-scale cross-border fake news production line. The goal is to shape China’s international image while smearing political rivals, particularly the US and its allies.
This not only threatens the free-flow of factual information, but challenges the foundations of democratic societies.
Research from Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto shows that Shenzhen, China-based Haimaiyunxiang Media Co is behind the 100-site network. On the surface, Haimaiyunxiang appears to be a marketing firm, but behind the curtains is the Chinese government and its digital influence activities. The scope of these efforts include more than 30 countries across Eurasia and Latin America. This has been nicknamed the “media great wall.”
At government direction and with civic implementation, this model shows how China is manipulating global information, attempting to shape international public discourse.
The tactics used by these fake news sites are varied, including creating what appear to be legitimate news sites, publishing articles in local languages that includes real information to raise the believability of their articles.
The strategy ensures that fake information could be picked up by local media, which in turn would influence public opinion and attitudes in Beijing’s favor.
Some of the content used is derived from conspiracy theories, such as blaming the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US. This is just one of several common tactics used by the news sites.
The Chinese government-sponsored dissemination campaign not only creates a threat to target countries’ governments and social stability, but also harms the health of the global information ecosystem, with potentially far-reaching long-term consequences, such as the erosion of trust and social stability.
When it becomes difficult to discern real news from fake news, public trust is sure to wear away. The foundations of democratic systems — the power of citizens to make choices based on real information — could also be challenged.
A joint response from international society is needed to tackle the threat of cross-border fake news. Such efforts should include campaigns to increase people’s ability to discern fake news from real news, and bolster the sharing and cooperation of international news outlets, as well as implement severe sanctions against distributors of fake news.
Only through international cooperation and joint efforts could we guarantee the flow of factual information and safeguard the foundations of democratic societies.
Chueh Li
Taipei
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS