US magazine The Diplomat in December published an article analyzing last month’s presidential election in Taiwan.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used cognitive warfare methods against Taiwan to interfere in the elections by influencing voters’ perceptions. Furthermore, the CCP aimed to make Taiwanese unconsciously accept the ideas that it was trying to instill. The CCP used Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China to profusely express their views about elections or the future of Taiwan’s economy. The CCP wanted these key people, who are quite influential in Taiwan, to guide their employees or followers, thus using infiltration to indirectly influence the integrity of Taiwan’s democracy.
China’s most common methods are as follows:
The first is psychological warfare. Modern wars do not just involve fighting with conventional weapons, but also use hybrid warfare to stealthily cause anxiety among an adversary’s population — in this case Taiwanese. For example, in relation to the war between Ukraine and Russia, the CCP has used Taiwanese media to spread the notion of “today Ukraine, tomorrow Taiwan,” thus spreading fear and shaking the confidence of Taiwanese. The CCP tries to sow the seeds of division between the public and the government to weaken people’s trust in the authorities.
The second method is to attack Taiwan’s economic lifeline, such as by canceling permits for Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan, imposing sanctions on Taiwanese companies and making it difficult for Taiwan’s agricultural and fishery products to be sold in China. For instance, the CCP has spread stories about egg shortages to induce Taiwanese people to think that politics affects the public’s livelihood and to pressure Taiwan’s government to make concessions to China.
The third method is suppressing Taiwan’s international status by isolating it diplomatically. Since 2019, Kiribati, the Solomon Islands, Nicaragua, Honduras and Nauru have cut diplomatic relations with Taiwan and established ties with China, thereby weakening Taiwan’s international influence. This isolation hinders Taiwan’s participation in international negotiations, agreements, global forums, strategic partnerships and cooperation. The CCP demands that all countries abide by the “one China” principle and it seeks to create a pretext for invading Taiwan by force.
The CCP’s cognitive warfare strategy is more complex and diverse than one can imagine. It first breaks down the psychological defenses of Taiwanese to make them anxious. It proceeds to quietly sow divisions among Taiwanese and uses economic pressure to create difficulties for Taiwanese businesspeople in China and sectors such as agriculture and fisheries. This encourages people to resent the government, thus shattering the public’s trust in it and misleading people into thinking that the government does not care about their needs. Eventually, it might destabilize people’s ideas about unifying the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
In addition, the CCP cultivates China’s image as a major power to suppress Taiwan’s international status. It uses diplomatic carrots and sticks to put pressure on other countries and increase China’s influence.
Consequently, people in Taiwan must learn to recognize all these aspects of the CCP’s cognitive warfare methods and strengthen their media literacy. People must realize that war is not just a matter of the battlefield. Taiwanese must also be vigilant about ideological attempts to implant pro-unification ideas in their minds.
Chen Ching is a researcher on cross-strait relations and a commentator on international relations and current affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS