US magazine The Diplomat in December published an article analyzing last month’s presidential election in Taiwan.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used cognitive warfare methods against Taiwan to interfere in the elections by influencing voters’ perceptions. Furthermore, the CCP aimed to make Taiwanese unconsciously accept the ideas that it was trying to instill. The CCP used Taiwanese businesspeople operating in China to profusely express their views about elections or the future of Taiwan’s economy. The CCP wanted these key people, who are quite influential in Taiwan, to guide their employees or followers, thus using infiltration to indirectly influence the integrity of Taiwan’s democracy.
China’s most common methods are as follows:
The first is psychological warfare. Modern wars do not just involve fighting with conventional weapons, but also use hybrid warfare to stealthily cause anxiety among an adversary’s population — in this case Taiwanese. For example, in relation to the war between Ukraine and Russia, the CCP has used Taiwanese media to spread the notion of “today Ukraine, tomorrow Taiwan,” thus spreading fear and shaking the confidence of Taiwanese. The CCP tries to sow the seeds of division between the public and the government to weaken people’s trust in the authorities.
The second method is to attack Taiwan’s economic lifeline, such as by canceling permits for Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan, imposing sanctions on Taiwanese companies and making it difficult for Taiwan’s agricultural and fishery products to be sold in China. For instance, the CCP has spread stories about egg shortages to induce Taiwanese people to think that politics affects the public’s livelihood and to pressure Taiwan’s government to make concessions to China.
The third method is suppressing Taiwan’s international status by isolating it diplomatically. Since 2019, Kiribati, the Solomon Islands, Nicaragua, Honduras and Nauru have cut diplomatic relations with Taiwan and established ties with China, thereby weakening Taiwan’s international influence. This isolation hinders Taiwan’s participation in international negotiations, agreements, global forums, strategic partnerships and cooperation. The CCP demands that all countries abide by the “one China” principle and it seeks to create a pretext for invading Taiwan by force.
The CCP’s cognitive warfare strategy is more complex and diverse than one can imagine. It first breaks down the psychological defenses of Taiwanese to make them anxious. It proceeds to quietly sow divisions among Taiwanese and uses economic pressure to create difficulties for Taiwanese businesspeople in China and sectors such as agriculture and fisheries. This encourages people to resent the government, thus shattering the public’s trust in it and misleading people into thinking that the government does not care about their needs. Eventually, it might destabilize people’s ideas about unifying the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
In addition, the CCP cultivates China’s image as a major power to suppress Taiwan’s international status. It uses diplomatic carrots and sticks to put pressure on other countries and increase China’s influence.
Consequently, people in Taiwan must learn to recognize all these aspects of the CCP’s cognitive warfare methods and strengthen their media literacy. People must realize that war is not just a matter of the battlefield. Taiwanese must also be vigilant about ideological attempts to implant pro-unification ideas in their minds.
Chen Ching is a researcher on cross-strait relations and a commentator on international relations and current affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS