The Ministry of Education on Friday said that vocational schools and senior-high high schools can trial allowing students to take mental health days off starting next month.
Since National Sun Yat-sen University first introduced “mental unwellness leave” in 2022, many colleges and universities embraced the policy, and 43 schools are to offer students mental health leave in the new semester starting this month.
The ministry on Monday last week released official guidelines for mental health leave at colleges and universities, stating that the purpose is to help students pay attention to mental health, while schools should initiate care measures, including counseling and referrals.
The guidelines also suggested allowing students to take a half or full day of leave for up to three days per semester.
A petition initiated by the Taiwan Youth Association for Democracy to introduce mental health leave in junior and senior-high schools garnered more than 3,000 student signatures in one day.
High-school and vocational high-school students must provide proof of a parent or guardian’s consent to take mental health leave, and those who take the leave are not eligible for perfect attendance, the ministry said.
In the 2022-2023 school year, more than 29,000 mental health days were taken by students at 11 universities. The association on Friday said that its survey showed that up to 90 percent of young people say leave would have a positive effect on their mental health. Several university presidents have praised the policy as supportive to students’ mental well-being.
The changes indicate that policymakers and schools are recognizing the importance of letting young people take time off to care for their mental health, but further measures must follow, especially as the policy is to be tested in high schools.
Parents, teachers and administrators need more guidance on how to provide support to students in need while protecting their privacy and preventing stigmatization, as it is generally harder at high school than it is at university to take time off without an absence being noticed by classmates.
Schools might need to train teachers and staff to identify signs of mental distress and develop strategies to follow up on students who take leave to see if additional support is needed, but not force them to accept counseling or make them feel more stressed from unwanted attention.
Moreover, students might need more help to find resources and support to meet their emotional needs, so effective mental health leave will require the participation of parents and guardians, as leaving a struggling teenager at home alone to play video games or sink into social media is unlikely to be beneficial and might even be risky if they are depressed or have suicidal thoughts.
While taking a mental health day can be a warning signal that a student might need help, many parents also need assistance to tell when they should let their child take a day off, to talk to their child to better understand their emotional needs and to decide whether taking a day off is the best solution and not just an excuse to skip a test, hide from conflict or catch up on overdue assignments.
They might also need guidance on how to help their child spend the mental health day or when to consult a mental health professional if they suspect their child’s condition is chronic or severe.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS