In a closely watched contest, the unofficial quick count results are now out and strongly suggest a landslide victory for the man who is poised to be Indonesia’s next president: fiery former special forces commander Prabowo Subianto, who was also, for a time, the son-in-law of the archipelago’s former president Suharto.
No doubt there would be much hand-wringing and headshaking over what went wrong for the other two candidates, former Central Java governor Ganjar Pranowo and former Jakarta governor Anies Baswedan. They have said they want to wait for the official results before conceding defeat, even though Prabowo has declared victory. Still, the unofficial results have historically been very accurate, and it is likely that come October when President Joko Widodo, widely known as Jokowi, steps down, Prabowo would be the one to replace him.
It is crucial for him to start thinking about the challenges ahead, both on the domestic front, but also, importantly, on the international stage. The 72-year-old defense minister would be inheriting Indonesia at a time of complex geopolitical issues. Gaza and Israel, the US and China, an assertive Russia, and an unpredictable North Korea.
Although the archipelago has always maintained an independent foreign policy, Prabowo would need to tread carefully — and that is not something he is good at.
He has remade his image as a cute and cuddly grandpa from the once forceful general, but some of that temper was evident on the campaign trail. In 2019, when he last contested the election, he told an unsuspecting foreign correspondent that he was “not somebody who is afraid of white people,” and that he was not going to be lectured on democracy.
None of that vitriol or fury was apparent at his victory parade in central Jakarta on Wednesday. Beaming as he entered the packed Istora Senayan Sports Arena, it was obvious this historical moment was not lost on the man who tried to be Indonesia’s president several times before.
His supporters had started gathering hours before in anticipation of a victory, and as he addressed them they broke out in applause and cheers, dancing to the now popular tune OKE Gas that has accompanied his campaign. He talked in his speech about the importance of being a president for all Indonesians and bringing the nation together after months of intense divisions.
Many of the people I spoke to at the event were thrilled that Prabowo was set to be their next president. “He is a strong man,” one woman said to me. “He will make Indonesia strong again.”
It is a remarkable image makeover for a man with a checkered history. He was accused of the abduction and disappearance of student activists during the pro-democracy protests that eventually led to Suharto’s resignation in 1998, amid street protests fueled by economic turmoil. Prabowo also headed the army’s special forces unit, Kopassus, and was incriminated in alleged human rights violations in the former province of East Timor. He has consistently denied all allegations, and in this campaign, has appeared to shake off the past. We must focus on the future, he thundered to the crowd at his victory parade. It seems millions of Indonesians agree with him.
Central to that is a sense of pride and nationalism and a desire to have their place in the world. Council of Foreign Relations senior fellow for Southeast Asia Joshua Kurlantzick said: “Prabowo definitely wants Indonesia to be seen as a bigger power in Asia and on the world stage — to take back real leadership of ASEAN, play a bigger role in global institutions.”
It would be on the international front that Prabowo might face the biggest challenges. The first order of business would be the relationship with the US — which has been awkward to say the least. He was banned from going there for two decades, ostensibly because of his alleged human rights record, but Washington allowed him back in after he was selected as defense minister in Jokowi’s Cabinet. Indonesia under Jokowi has been building close ties with both the US and China, and for the most part, Prabowo is expected to continue with that, particularly in terms of courting Chinese investment, which has been a strong feature of Jokowi’s administration.
The superpowers’ jostle for influence would no doubt be a key theme of Indonesia’s future. The country, which is the largest economy in Southeast Asia, should, in theory, be a natural partner for Washington. It is a large, vibrant democracy with historically strong military ties to the US. Its economic prospects are relatively strong, and the archipelago no longer needs to kowtow to either Beijing or Washington to ensure its relevance.
This is why Prabowo’s relationship with the US would be closely monitored by other regional partners, especially in an election year for both countries. It looks increasingly likely that former US president Donald Trump could well be back in the White House. Asian governments are beginning to calculate what a Trump presidency might mean for them, and Jakarta should do the same.
The combination of a Prabowo-Trump duo could be explosive. The two men, in some ways have some striking similarities. In 2019, after losing to Jokowi, Prabowo refused to concede defeat, saying instead that he had won the election. Oftentimes, Prabowo has echoed the US politician’s campaign slogans, saying it was time to “make Indonesia great again.”
Like Trump, Prabowo is an unpredictable leader. He has yet to display Jokowi’s ability for compromise and political maneuvering. Prabowo would no doubt have his predecessor in the background, if not by his side. His vice president, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, is the current president’s eldest son, and Jokowi’s image has been plastered on Prabowo-Gibran posters.
Indonesians voted for two politicians on their ballots on Wednesday to lead them into the future: In reality, they are getting three.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS