A lone polar bear on an iceberg. This year’s Wildlife Photographer of the Year People’s Choice Award winner is, in many ways, a photo we have seen before. It is a peaceful scene, with the slumbering bear reminiscent of a contented house cat. Yet it is a reminder that all life depends on ecosystems that are growing increasingly fragile as the planet heats with our greenhouse gas emissions.
A new study underscores the same message of fragility through images of polar bears in a landscape we rarely envisage — terrain completely devoid of snow or ice. Researchers tracked 20 bears in Manitoba, Canada, equipping them with video collars to monitor activity levels and food intake. There is a lesson for us all in the surprising and sobering results.
Polar bears in this region have long become land-based during ice-free periods and the time spent without sea ice — periods when they cannot hunt their usual prey — is getting longer. In the 1980s, they would be on land for about 110 days. That has since increased by three weeks, and is only expected to get longer thanks to the climate crisis (the arctic is warming roughly four times faster than the planet as a whole).
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
While on shore, bears were thought to fast, conserving precious energy until the sea ice returned. However, the study showed differences in survival strategies between individuals. Some did not seek sustenance. The laziest bear rested for 98 percent of the time — making lead author Anthony Pagano’s job of watching 115 hours of video footage a slog at points. Others were surprisingly active, moving across the landscape and consuming a range of terrestrial foods including bird carcasses, duck eggs, berries and seaweed.
It did not really matter what strategies the bears employed. Apart from one lucky nanuk who was able to feed on a large mammal, all of them lost body mass. While land-based fodder compensated for the energy expended seeking it out, berries and birds do not sustain a polar bear. They are simply too big, US Geological Survey research wildlife biologist Pagano says. The implication is that if the ice-free period extends for long enough, the bear population in the area would starve.
The animals were more active than expected, which raises a few extra risks. The first is knock-on effects for seabird colonies and other land-based creatures, who might end up getting preyed upon more than they are used to.
The other big consequence is that, in their search for food, hungry bears might wind up in human settlements, including communities not accustomed to having apex predators in their backyards. That makes the development of management techniques to keep both bears and humans safe crucial.
Contrary to the researchers’ expectations, there was no correlation between energy expenditure and body condition. In other words, the driver behind the different tactics is individual-level variation: Some bears might simply be lazier than others.
Pagano told me that there were some behaviors with no clear explanation. Three individuals, for instance, spent between 10 percent and 16 percent of their time swimming, an energy-intensive activity for the world’s largest living bear species.
Even though two out of three did find marine mammal carcasses, looking at the wind speed and direction, Pagano and his team concluded it was unlikely they could smell food in the water from the shore.
One young female meanders along in the water before she presumably catches the scent of a beluga whale carcass, makes a sharp turn eastwards and continues swimming along a much straighter line. However, the deceased did not end up serving as a meal — the bear was only observed feeding on it for 35 seconds out of the six hours she spent with it — but as a buoy to rest on. In total, the bear swam 175km for little gain. Similarly, when an adult female who found a seal carcass out at sea attempted to bring it to shore, she eventually dropped it during her swim after only feeding on it for a total of 20 seconds.
There is no knowing why these three bears swam so far, but it put them at a disadvantage: They each had the earliest predicted time of starvation for their respective age and gender.
There is a tendency to believe animals have an unimpeachable survival instinct — that a species would behave, as a group, in the same, optimal way. However, just as humans are not always the rational actors some economists model us to be, neither are animals. This does not make them stupid, but speaks instead to their intelligence: Each bear is trying to creatively solve the puzzle of how to stay alive in a challenging scenario.
Some behavior, such as the long swims, could be categorized as maladaptation, which humans also fall prey to. In trying to adapt to the climate crisis, projects could actually make us more vulnerable or simply waste resources. For example, we keep building higher flood barriers, only to see the water redirected to an area without protections or have them breached as climate change intensifies storms. In some cases, efforts to make farming resilient to drought actually made the farms less water-secure.
We do not know if those bears learned that swimming brings little reward. However, as humans, we have a unique advantage to avoid the same maladaptive mistakes: We could review our actions as well as the decisions of others, collecting data and modeling impacts to optimize our collective blueprint for survival in a changing world. We could also read studies about polar bears — and vow both to learn from their behavior and protect them.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS