A lone polar bear on an iceberg. This year’s Wildlife Photographer of the Year People’s Choice Award winner is, in many ways, a photo we have seen before. It is a peaceful scene, with the slumbering bear reminiscent of a contented house cat. Yet it is a reminder that all life depends on ecosystems that are growing increasingly fragile as the planet heats with our greenhouse gas emissions.
A new study underscores the same message of fragility through images of polar bears in a landscape we rarely envisage — terrain completely devoid of snow or ice. Researchers tracked 20 bears in Manitoba, Canada, equipping them with video collars to monitor activity levels and food intake. There is a lesson for us all in the surprising and sobering results.
Polar bears in this region have long become land-based during ice-free periods and the time spent without sea ice — periods when they cannot hunt their usual prey — is getting longer. In the 1980s, they would be on land for about 110 days. That has since increased by three weeks, and is only expected to get longer thanks to the climate crisis (the arctic is warming roughly four times faster than the planet as a whole).
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
While on shore, bears were thought to fast, conserving precious energy until the sea ice returned. However, the study showed differences in survival strategies between individuals. Some did not seek sustenance. The laziest bear rested for 98 percent of the time — making lead author Anthony Pagano’s job of watching 115 hours of video footage a slog at points. Others were surprisingly active, moving across the landscape and consuming a range of terrestrial foods including bird carcasses, duck eggs, berries and seaweed.
It did not really matter what strategies the bears employed. Apart from one lucky nanuk who was able to feed on a large mammal, all of them lost body mass. While land-based fodder compensated for the energy expended seeking it out, berries and birds do not sustain a polar bear. They are simply too big, US Geological Survey research wildlife biologist Pagano says. The implication is that if the ice-free period extends for long enough, the bear population in the area would starve.
The animals were more active than expected, which raises a few extra risks. The first is knock-on effects for seabird colonies and other land-based creatures, who might end up getting preyed upon more than they are used to.
The other big consequence is that, in their search for food, hungry bears might wind up in human settlements, including communities not accustomed to having apex predators in their backyards. That makes the development of management techniques to keep both bears and humans safe crucial.
Contrary to the researchers’ expectations, there was no correlation between energy expenditure and body condition. In other words, the driver behind the different tactics is individual-level variation: Some bears might simply be lazier than others.
Pagano told me that there were some behaviors with no clear explanation. Three individuals, for instance, spent between 10 percent and 16 percent of their time swimming, an energy-intensive activity for the world’s largest living bear species.
Even though two out of three did find marine mammal carcasses, looking at the wind speed and direction, Pagano and his team concluded it was unlikely they could smell food in the water from the shore.
One young female meanders along in the water before she presumably catches the scent of a beluga whale carcass, makes a sharp turn eastwards and continues swimming along a much straighter line. However, the deceased did not end up serving as a meal — the bear was only observed feeding on it for 35 seconds out of the six hours she spent with it — but as a buoy to rest on. In total, the bear swam 175km for little gain. Similarly, when an adult female who found a seal carcass out at sea attempted to bring it to shore, she eventually dropped it during her swim after only feeding on it for a total of 20 seconds.
There is no knowing why these three bears swam so far, but it put them at a disadvantage: They each had the earliest predicted time of starvation for their respective age and gender.
There is a tendency to believe animals have an unimpeachable survival instinct — that a species would behave, as a group, in the same, optimal way. However, just as humans are not always the rational actors some economists model us to be, neither are animals. This does not make them stupid, but speaks instead to their intelligence: Each bear is trying to creatively solve the puzzle of how to stay alive in a challenging scenario.
Some behavior, such as the long swims, could be categorized as maladaptation, which humans also fall prey to. In trying to adapt to the climate crisis, projects could actually make us more vulnerable or simply waste resources. For example, we keep building higher flood barriers, only to see the water redirected to an area without protections or have them breached as climate change intensifies storms. In some cases, efforts to make farming resilient to drought actually made the farms less water-secure.
We do not know if those bears learned that swimming brings little reward. However, as humans, we have a unique advantage to avoid the same maladaptive mistakes: We could review our actions as well as the decisions of others, collecting data and modeling impacts to optimize our collective blueprint for survival in a changing world. We could also read studies about polar bears — and vow both to learn from their behavior and protect them.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS