English to shine
The American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan recently released its “2024 Business Climate Survey.” About 85 percent of its members were optimistic about Taiwan’s economic outlook for the next three years and it said that jobseekers generally possess qualities that make Taiwanese more competitive in the international market
Among these qualities, the top five in order were: diligence, reliability, execution, commitment and teamwork.
As for the most obvious weaknesses of Taiwan’s human resources, international mindset topped the list, followed by poor English-language skills.
This is absolutely true, as the two weaknesses are linked by a causal relationship.
English is an international language. If a person’s English proficiency is low, they would naturally face obstacles to acquiring global information and connecting to the world.
Given the foundation of the bilingual education policy of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration and its implementation over the past eight years, president-elect William Lai (賴清德) should continue to push the policy boldly once he takes office in May to maintain the bold progress.
Not long ago, the Ministry of National Defense repeatedly sent nationwide emergency alert messages to all citizens’ cellphones. In addition to the mistranslation of “satellite” as “missile,” there were at least three grammatical errors in a short message with only nine English words, which was absurd in the extreme.
English-language training courses — whether they be long or short-term — as well as talent trained or employed by the ministry or the three branches of the armed forces are clearly far short of expectation.
Despite Taiwan boasting the world’s highest rate of master’s theses and doctoral dissertations, the rate of academic plagiarism is high, which might also be linked to the problem of poor English ability.
Previous generations of Taiwanese worked extremely hard to create an economic miracle. Given the development of the Internet as a global conduit and store of information, as well as the emergence of competitor nations, it is absolutely necessary for Taiwanese to improve their English skills.
That would open more doors to the international community, and allow Taiwan and talented Taiwanese to shine more brightly on the world stage.
Fang Fu-chuan
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS