As Taiwanese return to work and regular routines following the Lunar New Year break, the hope is for a new start.
It is good to be positive, but wise to be aware of dangers ahead.
With headlines including phrases such as an “age of conflict,” an “era of insecurity” and “the decade of living dangerously,” as well as dire warnings from a historian of lessons from the Cold War being neglected and of stumbling into a “dangerous moment in world history” and Beijing’s preparations for a protracted war in the Indo-Pacific region, a survey of recent reports, forums and interviews might temper positivity.
First, the good news. In the Economist Intelligence Unit’s (EIU) Democracy Index 2023 report, Taiwan ranked No. 10 in the world and second in Asia and Australasia, where it was second only to New Zealand. Taiwan’s democracy was down slightly compared with the previous three years, but is still on an upward trajectory since the first report in 2006. It ranked higher than Japan and South Korea in Asia, and well above the US, which has been labeled a “flawed democracy” since 2016.
However, the EIU report is subtitled Age of Conflict, while the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Military Balance 2024 report warns of an “era of insecurity,” citing the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Hamas-Israel war in Gaza, coups in Niger and Gabon, Azerbaijan retaking the Nagorno-Karabakh region and China’s belligerence over Taiwan and the South China Sea.
An analyst in the Military Balance report said that Beijing has drawn lessons from the Ukraine war, developing weapons and capabilities, and laying pre-emptive legal foundations that suggest it is preparing for a “protracted” conflict in the Indo-Pacific region. Its actions are driving massive military spending increases by Japan and South Korea, which are hoping to deter China.
Historian Niall Ferguson in an interview on Wednesday last week with former Australian deputy prime minister John Anderson predicted that “on the current trajectory” of the war in Europe, Ukraine would lose and if the US also fails to defend Israel from a multifront assault in the Middle East orchestrated by Iran and its proxies, it would lose any pretense of a credible deterrence. If this happens, what would stop Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) from attempting to take Taiwan by force, Ferguson asked.
Taking Taiwan by force is something that Xi would want to avoid, former Chinese ambassador to the US Cui Tiankai (崔天凱) told the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Asia Spotlight 2024 conference in Washington on Jan. 25.
Cui was talking with speakers from Singapore, Indonesia, Japan and India, including Indian security expert C. Raja Mohan, who said that India-China ties would not improve until the tensions at the border were addressed, but that the India-China relationship has never been as bad as it is today, with “very limited engagement,” a far cry from the days of the “good neighbor policy” under then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平).
Cui assured his fellow participants that China would eventually annex Taiwan, but said that it would not “fall into the trap” of getting involved in a “proxy war” of another nation that was supplying weapons to Taiwan, a clear reference to the US.
Cui said he was talking in a “personal capacity” as a retired diplomat. That is arguable. He was in line with Beijing’s official messaging.
The conference was titled “The Decade of Living Dangerously.” It is not a positive title, but few would argue with the assessment.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence