As Nigeria’s vice president cut the ribbon on Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) diaper production line in 2017, the US$300 million facility near Lagos was hailed as a symbol of the nation’s economic ambitions. In December last year, the company said it was leaving the West African state.
The US consumer goods giant is not alone. At least three other global conglomerates have announced they are exiting Africa’s most populous nation and second-biggest economy, among them GSK, Bayer and Sanofi. Unilever last year cut some of the products it was manufacturing in the nation. Nestle has posted losses from its operations.
At the heart of the exodus is a scarcity of the US dollars international businesses need to repatriate earnings. The central bank has devalued the naira twice in the past eight months, and is still struggling to clear a backlog of demand for greenbacks companies require to pay debts and import raw materials. A near complete absence of a reliable electricity supply and congestion at Nigeria’s ports are compounding the malaise.
“It’s news because it’s P&G. It’s news because it’s GSK. It’s news because they have been in the country for a long time — but there are others that have died quietly,” Segun Ajayi-Kadir, director-general of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria advocacy group, said on local television said after the P&G announcement. “If the current situation doesn’t improve, certainly we’ll have more closures.”
Some of the world’s largest oil reserves, ample fertile land and a rapidly growing population should have created a lucrative market for producers of consumer goods following the restoration of democracy in 1999. Instead policy missteps, corruption and an overreliance on oil fueled dysfunction in the economy. The middle class did not expand as much as expected.
The implications for Nigeria are bleak.
Its oil-dependent, US$394 billion economy is already hobbled by high levels of imports. The corporate exits — US$187 million in investment left the nation in 2022 compared with an inflow of almost US$9 billion in 2011 — only exacerbates pressure on the naira, which has depreciated 86 percent over the past eight years, and deal a further blow to long-standing diversification efforts.
Nigerian President Bola Tinubu has already introduced unpopular polices deemed necessary to revive the economy since taking office in May last year. He must now convince business that he can staunch the leak of big name multinationals from the nation.
Taxes and duties are being simplified, a committee has been set up within the office of the vice president to cut red tape and there is a plan to improve infrastructure, presidential spokesman Temitope Ajayi said.
Tinubu has also vowed to end jihadist violence and criminality that has made shipping goods in much of the north virtually impossible for many major companies.
“They can make a marked difference, but it will take time — not a couple of years,” said Pieter Scribante, a South Africa-based senior political economist at Oxford Economics.
Many companies cannot wait. PZ Cussons, a UK-based maker of soap and other personal care products that counts Nigeria as its biggest market, on Wednesday last week slashed its profit expectations for the whole group. Cadbury Nigeria has had to convert loans from its UK parent into equity because it could not find the foreign currency to repay them.
Nestle and Unilever are still operating on the sprawling industrial estate where the P&G production line was shuttered, but outside the walled complex, 65-year-old Raphael Babalola said he is not as busy loading boxes onto his truck for distribution as he once was. Some days he even drives off empty.
“Companies just aren’t producing like they used to,” he said.
Adigun Daniel, 63, another driver, said he is idle most of the time when only a few years ago he would transport goods to the east and north of Nigeria, a nation almost three times the size of Germany, at least twice week.
Other drivers have given up altogether and sold their trucks, he added.
Nigeria suffered two recessions in eight years after a drop in the price of crude oil drained foreign-exchange coffers and COVID-19 struck. Of the 230 million strong population, 130 are now multidimensionally poor, and with inflation at a 27-year high, fewer and fewer Nigerians can afford anything but the basics.
“Twenty years ago, 15 years ago it wasn’t a mirage, it was a real business opportunity, but given the complications it’s starting to look a lot less attractive,” said Adedayo Ademuwagun, a Lagos-based analyst at political risk firm Songhai Advisory of Nigeria.
Other companies that have tried and failed to crack the Nigerian market include South Africa’s Shoprite, Africa’s biggest grocer, which left in 2021 — 16 years after opening its first store in a nation it then envisaged as the linchpin of its planned expansion across Africa, which has largely been a disaster.
Clothing and food retailer Woolworths Holdings, fashion chain Truworths International and cereal and food producer Tiger Brands have also packed up.
For manufacturers there is an added difficulty — competition from lower-cost rivals such as Turkish diaper maker Hayat Kimya and a unit of Singapore’s Tolaram Group that makes Indomie Noodles, a national dish of sorts in Nigeria.
While these companies are also struggling, they are too invested to leave, said Girish Sharma, chief executive officer of the Colgate Tolaram joint venture in Nigeria. “Things are tough right now, [but] exiting is not an option.”
P&G declined to comment on the closure of its plant. When the news was announced in December last year, chief financial officer Andre Schulten said: “It’s very difficult for us as a US dollar-denominated company to create value [and] it’s also difficult to operate, because of the macroeconomic environment.”
The government says Nigerian firms can step in and fill the gap left by the corporate exits, but they are bleeding, too, with many of them among the 767 companies that shut down in the first quarter of last year alone.
However, the disused P&G factory did present an opportunity for Fouani, a local manufacturer, which now makes sanitary pads and diapers in the same complex.
Nigerian firms should be the priority, Ajayi-Kadir said, adding that he would like to see less taxes and more lines of credit.
“FDI [foreign direct investment] is excellent, but it should come secondary to empowering the local manufacturers,” he said. “That is when you have certainty that come rain, come shine, they will be with you.”
While Tinubu has taken measures that economists and investors in Nigeria’s capital markets say are long overdue, those steps are causing misery for ordinary people and sapping the popularity of his government.
Some, like Sharma, have faith in Tinubu even if the benefits of what he is doing are yet to be seen.
“He’s got a tough job,’’ Sharma said. “He will do things to fix the economy. As we speak lots of things are happening.’’
Additional reporting by Ashleigh Furlong, Ruth Olurounbi,
Anthony Osae-Brown, Yvonne Mhango, Janice Kew, Leslie Patton, Monique Vanek, Nduka Orjinmo, Tim Loh and Dasha Afanasieva
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS