Native language education became normalized in elementary schools in 2002. It has been a policy for 22 years, even with its idling during the eight years of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. It has been an interesting ride since the curriculum’s inception. Taiwan is a multicultural society, and respecting its diverse linguistic cultures has become a widespread value in its modern democracy.
Political power shifted back to homegrown political parties in 2016, and in 2019, the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法) promoted by the Ministry of Culture was passed and implemented. The ministry also confirmed which native languages were listed as choices in the compulsory curriculum for junior high and high schools, including various indigenous languages — Hakka, Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), Minnanese localized to Matsu Island and other islets in Lienchiang County, as well as Taiwanese sign language. The policy has been fully rolled out since the first week of the 2022 academic year. News of its implementation was exciting, as it had been a focal point for several Taiwan-focused cultural and education-related civic groups, and specialized academics and volunteers, having undergone countless back-and-forth struggles that ultimately passed with the cooperation of government authorities and organizations.
To this end, all of Taiwan’s native languages are legally considered national languages with their official status and rights guaranteed, and they are taught starting from elementary school all the way through to high school.
So, what is the reality of the education landscape for the junior high and high school native language curriculum, which has only been implemented for just over a year?
What needs attention first and foremost is the glaring issue of teacher credentials. Native language teachers mainly consist of part-time instructors and teaching support staff who have obtained intermediate to advanced-level language certifications and full-time instructors who hold native language instruction certifications and licenses. Despite the establishment of university-level extended education credits for native language instruction, due to the sparse number of instructors out there and even the screening of incoming instructors, fully fleshed-out expertise is difficult to cultivate. Even if teachers are completely devoted to passing on their native languages, it is difficult for them to develop their expertise, leading to a waste of human resources.
Second, the curriculum material tends to be difficult. As there is a three-year junior high school gap between elementary schools and high schools, and students might have to choose a different native language or take new immigrant language courses such as Vietnamese or Indonesian, differing from what they previously studied, it could be impossible to connect the knowledge gap for some students. Add on that there are few standardized tests for native language coursework, and some learning materials lack a connection to daily life, leaving instructors frustrated. The government as well as publishers could effectively target and improve upon this dearth of materials.
Although the government’s complementary measures leave a bit to be desired, we are still resolutely determined that it should realize equality and the protection of our endangered languages and cultures. We cannot sit on our thumbs waiting until the 11th hour for all the parts to come together to implement these measures. Elementary school-level native language education has been in effect for 22 years; the present system is already well-matured. We just need to put faith in junior high and high school native language instruction to mirror the layout of the elementary school-level curriculum, gradually moving it toward perfection.
Looking to the future, the government could comprehensively implement all stipulated contents of the act, fix the shortage of instructors and materials as soon as possible, and provide opportunities for native language instructors to hone their acumen so as to fill in the present shortage of instructors, further breathing more life into Taiwan’s native languages.
Ng Siu-lin is deputy director of the Northern Taiwan Society
Translated by Tim Smith
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US President Donald Trump is an extremely stable genius. Within his first month of presidency, he proposed to annex Canada and take military action to control the Panama Canal, renamed the Gulf of Mexico, called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy a dictator and blamed him for the Russian invasion. He has managed to offend many leaders on the planet Earth at warp speed. Demanding that Europe step up its own defense, the Trump administration has threatened to pull US troops from the continent. Accusing Taiwan of stealing the US’ semiconductor business, it intends to impose heavy tariffs on integrated circuit chips
RSS