During the darkest days of World War II, as young British pilots valiantly fought the Luftwaffe over southern England and German forces prepared to invade the British Isles, then-British prime minister Winston Churchill took on the task of boosting his fellow citizens’ morale, offering them a brighter future to look forward to.
To this end, Churchill’s inspirational wartime speeches occasionally featured a poem he likely encountered at Harrow School in the late 19th century. The poem, authored by Arthur Hugh Clough, an academic who had served as an assistant to Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, urged people to reject the notion that fighting for good was futile. It concluded with the phrase: “Westward, look, the land is bright.”
Churchill, whose affinity for the US was influenced by his US-born mother, confidently asserted that the US would continue to uphold liberal democratic values in the face of the totalitarian Nazi threat. Implicit in this declaration was the hope that, if necessary, the US would come to the aid of the UK and other western European liberal democracies.
However, when we look West today, we see dark, lowering clouds on the horizon. Should former US president Donald Trump win November’s presidential election, there is no guarantee that he would defend NATO or champion liberal democratic values, as his predecessors did. Similarly, there is little hope that Ukraine could rely on his support, given that the Republican Party’s leader prefers authoritarian leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin to the US’ democratic allies.
For many years, “the West” has been used as a shorthand for liberal democratic societies worldwide. Historically, US presidents have served as the de facto leaders of this alliance, formal and informal, all united by shared values and principles.
However, the growing possibility of a Trump return to the White House next year calls into question the stability of this coalition.
Can the Western democratic alliance endure a US president who does not believe in free and fair elections?
Trump, who is facing four criminal indictments and 91 felony charges, appears to regard the rule of law as a means of settling scores with his critics and perceived enemies, rather than as a fundamental pillar of democratic governance. If he were to be elected, there is little doubt that his second term would put the US on the path to authoritarian rule.
As the Western and Chinese governance models compete for global dominance, a potential Trump victory could tip the balance toward the latter. In their insightful book The Political Thought of Xi Jinping, Steve Tsang (曾銳生) and Olivia Cheung say that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) does not propose an alternative to the post-war liberal international order. Instead, Xi’s strategy is rooted in his vision of China as a Leninist one-party state ruled by a single leader — himself.
Consequently, Xi’s domestic political interests consistently overshadow any notion of global responsibility. He embraces the Confucian concept of the “Mandate of Heaven,” according to which rulers derive legitimacy from divine selection, and he expects his regime to be treated with the same deference accorded to imperial China at its peak.
Moreover, Xi has repeatedly touted China’s authoritarian system as a governance model for others to emulate. He believes that when nations, particularly those in the Global South, are presented with a choice, they would find the Chinese model more attractive than Western-style democracy. This could well be the case if Trump wins in November, and heads an administration plagued by corruption and chaos.
For the liberal democratic order to endure, Western nations must defend the principles that have underpinned their success during about 80 years of relative peace and prosperity. However, it is not enough to fight for these values in Ukraine, East Asia or the Middle East; they must be upheld domestically as well. As former US ambassador to the UN Adlai Stevenson, a two-time Democratic US presidential candidate, famously said: “We cannot be any stronger in our foreign policy — for all the bombs and guns we may heap up in our arsenals — than we are in the spirit which rules inside the country.”
Trump clearly does not share this sentiment, and neither do his fellow Republicans, almost all of whom seem to have forsaken their principles or, at the very least, concealed them to save their own political futures. Those of us who live outside the US and admire its achievements and founding principles pray that Americans make the right choice when they cast their ballots in November. Then, and only then, could we be able to declare, with the same confidence as Churchill: “Westward, look, the land is bright.”
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and a former EU commissioner for external affairs, is chancellor of the University of Oxford and the author of The Hong Kong Diaries.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS