The voters were the winners in the presidential and legislative elections. Jan. 13 was the first time since direct presidential elections began in Taiwan in 1996 that a party has won the presidency in more than two consecutive elections.
Unlike former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would be able to pass the baton to a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) successor. This is an acknowledgement of Tsai’s work, which further affirms her place in Taiwanese history.
However, the DPP did not win a majority in the Legislative Yuan. For one thing, some policies — such as “one fixed day off and one flexible rest day” for the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) — need to be improved. For another, election strategies should have been better.
Former DPP legislator Liu Chao-hao (劉櫂豪) ran as an independent after losing the DPP primary to Lai Kun-cheng (賴坤成). This led to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) victory in Taitung County.
Meanwhile, splits within local constituencies resulted in DPP legislator Kao Chia-yu’s (高嘉瑜) defeat.
Losing these two seats was critical. Consequently, the DPP is at a disadvantage in the legislature.
It is unnecessary to look back or blame certain people. The issue now is mathematical. The DPP has to either negotiate with the critical minority in the legislature or appropriate some people from the KMT. The former would require a great amount of work.
With limited time and amid internal splits after the elections, the DPP was unable to win over the critical minority to re-elect its speaker. Similarly, its efforts to recruit KMT legislators were also in vain. In the end, the Legislative Yuan fell under the KMT’s control.
When DPP Legislator You Si-kun (游錫?) was speaker, he maintained political neutrality. He did not exclusively favor the DPP. His unbiased approach, as well as his familiarity with legislative procedures and democratic order, allowed the Legislative Yuan to operate smoothly. You indeed offered great assistance to the Tsai administration.
Now, KMT Legislator-at-large Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) is the speaker. Even if he refrains from interfering in the legislature, he might create quite a few problems due to his lack of knowledge about procedures.
This would be the greatest challenge not only for president-elect William Lai (賴清德), but also Tsai. How later generations view her depends on the transition of power. Lai must continue the reforms started by Tsai’s administration to ensure that Taiwan can play an important role in the international democratic community.
He should seek to make Taiwan a prosperous and sustainable country with a strong military that shines in the world. This requires the ruling party to work with non-governmental organizations based on consensus, so that Lai can secure his leadership and guide Taiwan in a stable way.
Although the KMT won the legislative speakership, the DPP should keep working to secure a majority through partnerships. When it comes to reviewing budgets and bills, it would need help to facilitate its agenda. It also needs to prevent Han from interfering in the legislature.
The DPP must not make the same mistakes again. It must avoid interparty turmoil. Internal factions must work together for the greater good. Only in this way can Lai carry out his agenda without a hitch. This is not only for the sake of democratic values, but also for the benefit of all parties and people in Taiwan.
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS