In addition to sending a flurry of spy balloons over Taiwan in the past few months, Beijing on Tuesday last week unilaterally removed previously agreed restrictions on flight paths in the Taiwan Strait, a move that alters the “status quo” of the Strait in another retaliatory action after January’s presidential election. China is trying to create a “new normal” to restrict Taiwan’s sovereignty with less costly, but still coercive tools.
China’s spy balloons have seized the world’s attention, and last year sparked US-China tensions. In that incident, the US Air Force on Feb. 4 last year shot down an observation balloon from China that had traversed the US’ airspace. The Pentagon said it was carrying intelligence-gathering equipment.
In the lead-up to the Jan. 13 elections and continuing since, numerous balloons from China have been detected near and over Taiwan. From Dec. 7 last year to Jan. 16, at least 54 balloons from China have flown over the Taiwan Strait median line and Taiwan’s air defense identification zone near major bases, the Ministry of National Defense has said. The frequency of balloon flights, their proximity to Taiwan and their extended flights suggest they were not scientific weather balloons as Beijing has claimed.
Last week, China added another intimidation tactic, announcing that it had unilaterally altered flight paths in breach of a March 2015 agreement signed by Chinese officials and Taipei. China said that it would no longer require that southbound civilian flights stay 6 nautical miles (11.1km) west of the M503 route, and would also allow eastbound flights on the W122 and W123 flight paths. Those restrictions were in place in the original agreement to avoid emergency situations, and changes were supposed to be confirmed by both sides.
Sending spy balloons over Taiwan and unilaterally altering flight routes in the Taiwan Strait are obviously part of China’s increasingly aggressive attempts to intimidate Taiwan after voters flouted Beijing’s warnings and elected Vice President William Lai (賴清德) as president. The changes, which would put flights around Taiwan’s outlying island at risk due to partially overlapping routes, were deployed to exhaust Taiwan’s military forces, constrain its air defense strategies and intimidate Taiwanese.
While invading Taiwan would be a deadly and costly endeavor for China, which is facing a beleaguered economy, political turmoil and military corruption, Beijing is relying on cognitive warfare and diplomatic measures to intimidate Taiwan and restrict its international presence. The flight path changes, balloon flyovers and military intrusions are in line with China’s “legal warfare,” aiming to blur the Taiwan Strait median line and undermine the legitimacy of Taiwan’s designated air zones.
Lai has expressed goodwill and openness in resuming dialogue with China to resolve differences across the Strait. Nevertheless, Beijing would likely escalate its aggressive behavior before and after Lai’s inauguration as part of its ambition to “unify” with Taiwan. The government, especially the new president and incoming administration, should establish a long-term and multifaceted strategy to confront China’s harassment. That should include guidelines for shooting down China’s intrusive objects once they are determined to be a major threat and to demonstrate Taiwan’s determination for self-defense, as well safeguarding the “status quo” in the Strait. Taiwan should also ramp up efforts to expose China’s attempts to sabotage the international order and norms in the Strait and seek more international support, as China is also sending balloons over other countries and engaging in aggressive actions against its neighbors, particularly in territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Taiwan needs to and should do more to confront and fight against China’s coercion.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS