Export orders used to be a key leading indicator for Taiwan’s exports and economy. The rules have changed, as export orders and actual exports have diverged in recent months. A closer look at these two key economic indicators is needed to acquire a holistic view of the nation’s economy, given that local manufacturers have allocated some overseas production back home.
Export orders again drifted into a negative territory in December, dropping 16 percent year-on-year to US$43.81 billion, after a brief upturn in November. The Ministry of Economic Affairs expects the downtrend to continue in the first half of this year. Meanwhile, exports expanded for a second straight month in December, increasing 11.6 percent annually to US$39.94 billion. The Ministry of Finance said it expected last month’s exports to make further gains.
Export orders include orders received by local manufacturers’ local headquarters and overseas operations, while exports only count outbound shipments based on orders received by manufacturers’ local operations. Therefore, slowing export orders indicate that outbound demand, especially from China, has been sluggish. In December, about 48.6 percent of products ordered were produced in overseas factories, primarily in China, down 4.4 percentage points from a year earlier, as local manufacturers allocated some overseas production back home, especially in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
Quanta Computer Inc and a number local manufacturers have moved production of high-end servers — including artificial intelligence (AI) servers and other high-end products — back to Taiwan over the past few years, it said.
Last year as a whole, ICT exports surged 29 percent year-on-year to US$83.36 billion as a result of demand related to AI devices. It was a new record, finance ministry data showed. Exports to the US and Europe also climbed to record highs. However, China, including Hong Kong, last year witnessed its worst slump on record mainly because of a decrease in demand for electronic components.
A rebound in ICT demand has helped fuel Taiwan’s exports, but the growth has not been enough to offset sluggish global demand. Yet it does bode well for the ICT-reliant economy, as it means that supply chain inventory is slimming down and the inventory correction cycle might be nearing its end, signaling a marked rebound in the next few months.
If China’s Lunar New Year shopping season goes well, local ICT manufacturers can expect a better rebound. Disappointing economic conditions in China have been a key drag on Taiwan’s export orders, the ministry said.
Chipmakers Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and United Microelectronics Corp have said their customers are significantly reducing their inventory, but are wary of placing big orders as they prefer to be extremely cautious about inventory control.
The ministries and most Taiwanese electronics companies are pinning their hope on AI to drive growth in the third and fourth quarters, as long as no black swan events occur. Emerging demand for AI technology is considered an important new growth engine for export orders and exports alike.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS