From the influencer Alisasa (愛莉莎莎) claiming that the presidential election was rigged in a now-deleted post, to YouTube content creator Superpie (超哥) physically assaulting someone during a livestream, the actions of influencers are increasingly coming under public scrutiny. Alisasa and Superpie have since apologized. Nevertheless, many people worry that these irresponsible influencers, who seem to prioritize garnering views on social media over anything else, have outsized sway in Taiwan’s sociocultural landscape.
This “nuisance influencer problem” is not unique to Taiwan. Johnny Somali, a US live streamer, is known for harassing locals and yelling racist remarks during his live streams in Japan. Somali’s income largely stems from donations from Internet trolls who find humor in such obnoxious behavior. There is a monetary incentive for Somali to be as rude and abrasive as possible, as infamy still brings rewards in today’s online ecosystem. He has been arrested for obstruction of business due to playing loud music at a restaurant and has since apologized in court, promising to “never take videos again,” the Japan Times reported.
Many content creators have been vocal in condemning Somali to discourage such behavior, showing that the online community could still self-regulate to some extent. Nonetheless, his change in behavior is only a result of legal action.
Hence, some argue for the government to take stricter oversight of influencers. China has chosen this path. According to the Chinese state-owned Global Times, the Chinese Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission announced that “short videos spreading wrong values, such as boasting for an incorrect career view, unscrupulous means, negative nihilism, flaunting wealth, worshiping materialism, and indulging in extravagance, will be subject to supervision.”
However, this approach seems excessive and leads to a slippery slope that erodes freedom of expression.
Furthermore, regulating influencers to curb moral turpitude is treating the symptoms, not the disease.
Alisasa’s election denialism reflects Taiwan’s increasingly populist political climate, which leads to baseless conspiracy theories being accepted at face value and promoted by people of all ages, including college-educated voters. In other words, Alisasa is selling a message that the audience was already demanding.
Superpie’s resorting to violence reflects Taiwan’s gangster subculture, which often sees violence as the only option to defend one’s masculinity. Simply banning these influencers from social media does not address the root cause of social problems.
In a society that values freedom of expression, nuisance influencers are here to stay for better or worse. They might be loud and flashy, but the court of public opinion is rarely on their side. Social pushback is inevitable in extreme cases like that of Somali. Impressionable teens might pick up bad habits by watching these creators’ content, but these habits are usually abandoned as teens mature.
Nonetheless, parents need to be acquainted with forces that influence teens online — forces that operate without much oversight.
Ultimately, what makes an influencer a “nuisance influencer” is inherently subjective, as standards of morality differ from person to person. Influencers, especially those with large platforms, should bear social responsibility for their words and actions. With social media algorithms promoting those who accumulate more watch time and views, the best way to deal with nuisance influencers is to not interact with their content to begin with.
Linus Chiou is a graduate student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
Deflation in China is persisting, raising growing concerns domestically and internationally. Beijing’s stimulus policies introduced in September last year have largely been short-lived in financial markets and negligible in the real economy. Recent data showing disproportionately low bank loan growth relative to the expansion of the money supply suggest the limited effectiveness of the measures. Many have urged the government to take more decisive action, particularly through fiscal expansion, to avoid a deep deflationary spiral akin to Japan’s experience in the early 1990s. While Beijing’s policy choices remain uncertain, questions abound about the possible endgame for the Chinese economy if no decisive
RSS