We pay tribute to the courage of women’s organizations, individuals and human rights activists in Taiwan who are speaking out against attempts to open up surrogacy in Taiwan, as outlined in the Taipei Times article “Public hearings to be held on surrogacy” published on Jan. 23.
In doing so, they add their voices to those of other women’s organizations fighting against surrogacy in Belgium, Germany, Ukraine, Canada, Japan, South Korea, South American countries and elsewhere.
Surrogacy is wrongly portrayed as progress with a bright side, with intended parents elated to receive the children they have ordered, yet the dark side of surrogacy remains invisible: Nobody really cares about the women hired as surrogate mothers or the children born through surrogacy. However, everyone should be aware that surrogate pregnancies are riskier than natural pregnancies because of the technology used: genetic material foreign to the surrogate mother and multiple embryo transfers. Women who agree to this practice do so mostly out of economic necessity. All surrogacy contracts require surrogate mothers to give up their fundamental rights for the duration of the pregnancy, and international conventions show that surrogacy is akin to the sale of children and human trafficking.
We are grateful to Shan Hsin-ai (單信愛) and Hsieh Hui-chen (解慧珍), quoted in the Jan. 23 article, for raising these neglected issues in their speech.
Listen to the testimony of Alivia Maurel, a young woman born through surrogacy. At 32 years old, she still deals with a strong sense of abandonment and cannot get over the idea of having been exchanged for money. She was invited to speak in the Czech parliament and a video of her speech can be watched online.
The best interests of a child should not be bought or sold.
Marie-Josephe Devillers is co-president of the International Coalition for the Abolition of Surrogate Motherhood.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS