The Ministry of Health and Welfare last week announced a new system of three work shifts with specific nurse-to-patient ratio targets. The ministry has earmarked a budget of NT$4 billion (US$128 million) to reduce the ratio of nurses to patients, which would help to improve the quality of care for inpatients and reduce the number of in-hospital deaths.
Given the nation’s shortfall of more than 7,000 nurses in all categories of hospitals, this advancement in the policy of three shifts with specified nurse-to-patient ratios is definitely welcome.
With regard to the new system’s nurse-to-patient ratio, official data show that, apart from district hospitals, relatively more of which can reach the target ratios, hospitals in the other two categories, namely medical centers and regional hospitals, currently face a shortfall of about 3,400 nurses.
In the case of regional hospitals, nationwide they are about 50 percent short of meeting the standard nurse-to-patient ratios for all three shifts. If they cannot recruit enough nurses to meet the target ratios, they might be forced to meet them by reducing the number of beds instead.
As for the ministry assigning night-shift bonuses, some critics question why district hospitals’ bonuses are the lowest although their nurse-to-patient ratios are the best.
To be specific, the ministry’s standard ratios for medical centers are one nurse to nine patients for the evening shift and one to 11 for the night shift; for regional hospitals, they are one to 11 for the evening shift and one to 13 for the night shift; and for district hospitals, they are one to 13 for the evening shift and one to 15 for the night shift.
Critics said that in all three cases nurses have to sacrifice their sleeping hours, so why should district hospital nurses be paid lower bonuses? Does this not go against the principle of equal pay for equal work?
The equal pay for equal work principle should also include different risks and stress factors. Nurses working night shifts at medical centers often have to deal with patients needing urgent intervention. The risks and stress levels for nurses working night shifts in different categories of hospitals are different, so paying them different bonuses complies with the principle of equal pay for equal work.
For a long-term solution, the National Health Insurance’s budget should be gradually increased. With regard to budget allocation, there should be a guaranteed point value of 0.95 or more. Hospitals’ management and operations should be strengthened. Nurses’ wages and conditions need to be improved to attract more people to join the profession and thoroughly resolve the existing shortage.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS