China’s true colors
Last month, the Chinese Customs Tariff Commission announced that starting from Jan. 1, preferential tariffs on 12 petrochemical products established by the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement would be suspended. Chinese officials have indicated that preferential tariffs related to agriculture and fisheries, machine and vehicle parts, and textiles might also be revoked.
In the face of China’s economic coercion, a great number of Taiwanese businesspeople have already shifted their focus to the Southeast Asian market. Although these enterprises are affected by Beijing’s move, Taiwan clearly has rid itself of its entire dependence on the Chinese market. The New Southbound Policy has helped Taiwanese businesspeople be more flexible. The government’s goal of diversifying trade has been gradually realized.
On the other hand, China insists on controlling its market in a conventional way. Beijing tries to attract developing countries to its side by providing some incentives, derived from China’s internal market.
However, the truth is that for some countries that have participated in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), their economies soon collapsed.BRI contracts are fundamentally unequal treaties. China is an egoistic country and even more selfish than the West. Beijing has no sympathy for others.
China has suspended preferential tariffs, but this would not pose a major threat to Taiwan’s economy. Instead, Beijing’s move has in some ways helped Taiwanese confirm that economic decoupling from China is the right thing to do. The government has been exploring the Southeast Asian market in Vietnam, Thailand and India. As Taiwan continues to confront China’s unreasonable economic sanctions, the government must offer more precautionary measures to lower the risk for small and medium-sized enterprises. That way, officials and businesspeople can be prepared and collaborate to deal with upcoming problems.
Lin Che-yu
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS