An online talk show produced by STR Network, named The Night Night Show with Hello (賀瓏夜夜秀), invited Chinese investigative journalist Wang Zhian (王志安), who is now living in Tokyo after being blacklisted by Beijing, to discuss Taiwan’s election. Wang said that the election was nothing but a spectacle, and the ruling party used disabled people as a tool to win more votes.
He even mimicked Chen Chun-han (陳俊翰), a DPP legislator-at-large candidate and human rights lawyer who has spinal muscular atrophy. Having caused an uproar, Wang initially refused to apologize.
The controversy can be discussed from two aspects: the nature of The Night Night Show with Hello, and the nature of Wang Zhian.
The Night Night Show with Hello has become quite popular due to its racy content and the ways that it talks about politics with sarcasm. The show caters to younger viewers. Each episode is rather short and as a result, the issues discussed on the show cannot be explored in depth. Lacking a significant idea and profound values, the content of The Night Night Show with Hello somewhat resembles short-form videos on TikTok. Additionally, given that it discusses political issues and politicians in a carefully designed manner, the show is sensationalist in the extreme.
I used to enjoy an online show produced by Chen Tzu-chien (陳子見), also known as “Retina” (視網膜). At that time, I believed that Chen was a thoughtful young man capable of challenging the constitutional system and perceived reality. Through his show, he defended Taiwan’s democratic system while opposing the authoritarianism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Although Chen did not mention these ideological values explicitly, the audience could still catch on his ideas organically.
The Night Night Show with Hello is not entirely an entertainment program, nor is it a political talk show. It is simultaneously entertainment and political, and the reason that it tries to be both is to make more profit. In this sense, the show is similar to the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), which attempts to obtain as much benefit as possible under the banner of social justice. The TPP aims to gain more political advantages, whereas the show satisfies its audience by denigrating a certain event or person. Their objective is the same: maximizing profit.
After the show ends, the issues discussed by the show’s guests are left to the public. Nothing has been resolved. Sometimes, as in Wang’s case, the show would damage Taiwan’s democracy.
Inviting Wang as a guest to talk about Taiwan’s election is an act that exploits Taiwanese society. It reminds us of how the CCP would criticize Taiwan’s democracy by publicizing the merits of an authoritarian system. The CCP has ordered a number of “defectors” and “betrayers” to live in democratic countries. They are arranged there to criticize democratic systems, and their presence has become one of several toxic elements that might lead to the disintegration of democratic solidarity.
Wang’s appearance on the show was unexpected. His remarks and behavior were shocking as he displayed his contempt for Taiwan’s democracy. Through Wang, the CCP has successfully intervened in Taiwan’s online talk shows. While The Night Night Show with Hello is pathetic, Taiwanese should be aware of the CCP’s moves and concerned about Taiwan’s democratic future.
The production team of the show must be aware of what they can do. If the show is produced entirely on a profit-making basis without offering any meaningful content, it could eventually lose its audience.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of a junior high school.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS