Online talk show The Night Night Show with Hello (賀瓏夜夜秀) sparked controversy with an episode aired on Monday, in which guest Wang Zhian (王志安), a Chinese journalist who lives in Tokyo after being blacklisted by Beijing, ridiculed the posture and gestures of Chen Chun-han (陳俊翰), a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator-at-large candidate and human rights lawyer who has spinal muscular atrophy.
When asked about his thoughts on Taiwan’s elections by the show’s host, Wang said the parties’ election rallies felt like variety shows that have performers, arranged plots and “even pushed disabled people onto the stage to rouse sympathy,” before mimicking Chen and chanting: “Support the DPP.”
The host’s and audience’s laughter in response to Wang’s remark stirred public anger and drew condemnation from politicians and public figures, and companies withdrew their sponsorship from the show. As a result, a producer of the show named Hawkins (霍金) on Wednesday apologized to Chen and to viewers for what he called the production oversight.
However, Wang initially refused to apologize, saying on social media that the DPP used disabled people as an election tool and it is the “green communist” party that is putting pressure on the talk show to apologize. Wang later said he is willing to apologize to Chen in person if he felt offended, but still condemns the DPP for its actions.
The National Immigration Agency on Wednesday said it received many complaints about Wang’s behavior and confirmed that his appearence on the talk show breached the terms of his one-year multiple entry tourist visa for Chinese citizens, so Wang is to be banned from re-entering Taiwan on a short-term tourist visa for five years.
Wang said on social media that the DPP is carrying out retributive punishment against him and he called it the “democratic communist party.”
On Friday he uploaded a YouTube video saying he apologizes to Chen and all disabled people in Taiwan, and for the trouble he caused the talk show.
He also apologized to the DPP, but many said he was being sarcastic, as Wang said: “The DPP represents Taiwan’s democracy and public opinion.”
Wang failed to realize that the backlash and condemnation he received from the public is mainly against his disrespectful attitude toward people with disabilities and him seeing them as “tools” without individual subjectivity, and thus being “taken advantage of” by the DPP for electoral purposes.
He also said in his apology video that he had assumed Taiwan would tolerate a larger range of topics being talked about.
Wang failed to learn that even in a democratic society, freedom of expression still comes with some restrictions in cases such as spreading disinformation or inciting discrimination, hostility or violence.
Although his remarks did not breach a specific law, it offended Taiwan’s sense of nondiscrimination. He has been called out for it and the show has been boycotted by many, but he is not being punished for his criticism of a party.
Moreover, Wang also misunderstood or intentionally distorted why his tourist visa was revoked. It was because he violated the Regulations Governing the Approval of People of the Mainland Area Visiting Taiwan for Purposes of Tourism (大陸地區人民來台從事觀光活動許可辦法) by engaging in “work,” including journalism and appearing on a political talk show.
While Wang is trying to politicize the incident, acting as if he is being punished for his remarks against the DPP, Taiwanese should not be fooled. As politicians have shown a rare unity across party lines by speaking out against Wang’s disrespectful remark, the incident could hopefully cause some people to reflect on their discriminative attitude toward people with disabilities or special needs.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS