Online talk show The Night Night Show with Hello (賀瓏夜夜秀) sparked controversy with an episode aired on Monday, in which guest Wang Zhian (王志安), a Chinese journalist who lives in Tokyo after being blacklisted by Beijing, ridiculed the posture and gestures of Chen Chun-han (陳俊翰), a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator-at-large candidate and human rights lawyer who has spinal muscular atrophy.
When asked about his thoughts on Taiwan’s elections by the show’s host, Wang said the parties’ election rallies felt like variety shows that have performers, arranged plots and “even pushed disabled people onto the stage to rouse sympathy,” before mimicking Chen and chanting: “Support the DPP.”
The host’s and audience’s laughter in response to Wang’s remark stirred public anger and drew condemnation from politicians and public figures, and companies withdrew their sponsorship from the show. As a result, a producer of the show named Hawkins (霍金) on Wednesday apologized to Chen and to viewers for what he called the production oversight.
However, Wang initially refused to apologize, saying on social media that the DPP used disabled people as an election tool and it is the “green communist” party that is putting pressure on the talk show to apologize. Wang later said he is willing to apologize to Chen in person if he felt offended, but still condemns the DPP for its actions.
The National Immigration Agency on Wednesday said it received many complaints about Wang’s behavior and confirmed that his appearence on the talk show breached the terms of his one-year multiple entry tourist visa for Chinese citizens, so Wang is to be banned from re-entering Taiwan on a short-term tourist visa for five years.
Wang said on social media that the DPP is carrying out retributive punishment against him and he called it the “democratic communist party.”
On Friday he uploaded a YouTube video saying he apologizes to Chen and all disabled people in Taiwan, and for the trouble he caused the talk show.
He also apologized to the DPP, but many said he was being sarcastic, as Wang said: “The DPP represents Taiwan’s democracy and public opinion.”
Wang failed to realize that the backlash and condemnation he received from the public is mainly against his disrespectful attitude toward people with disabilities and him seeing them as “tools” without individual subjectivity, and thus being “taken advantage of” by the DPP for electoral purposes.
He also said in his apology video that he had assumed Taiwan would tolerate a larger range of topics being talked about.
Wang failed to learn that even in a democratic society, freedom of expression still comes with some restrictions in cases such as spreading disinformation or inciting discrimination, hostility or violence.
Although his remarks did not breach a specific law, it offended Taiwan’s sense of nondiscrimination. He has been called out for it and the show has been boycotted by many, but he is not being punished for his criticism of a party.
Moreover, Wang also misunderstood or intentionally distorted why his tourist visa was revoked. It was because he violated the Regulations Governing the Approval of People of the Mainland Area Visiting Taiwan for Purposes of Tourism (大陸地區人民來台從事觀光活動許可辦法) by engaging in “work,” including journalism and appearing on a political talk show.
While Wang is trying to politicize the incident, acting as if he is being punished for his remarks against the DPP, Taiwanese should not be fooled. As politicians have shown a rare unity across party lines by speaking out against Wang’s disrespectful remark, the incident could hopefully cause some people to reflect on their discriminative attitude toward people with disabilities or special needs.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS