During Internet celebrity Toyz’s (劉偉健) visit to fellow Internet celebrity Chao-ge’s (超哥) Japanese restaurant not long ago, the former repeatedly criticized the food quality when recording a live stream and was assaulted and injured by the latter outside the restaurant.
Later that night, Toyz went to a police station, accusing Chao-ge of “attempted murder.” After questioning, Chao-ge was taken to the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office for further questioning on multiple charges, including assault, intimidation, attempted murder and even organized crime. He was released on bail of NT$50,000.
Surprisingly, when leaving the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office, Chao-ge told the media that it was wrong to hit someone, but that he would still hit Toyz again if he could turn back time, showing no remorse. The e-celeb obviously crossed the line.
‘SUPERPIE’
Chao-ge has gained fame on the Internet by running his YouTube channel “Superpie” (超派人生), which has turned the term “superpie” — known as “chao pai” (超派) in Chinese, literally “chao clan” or “chao style” — into a popular buzzword in Taiwan.
Originally, the meaning of “chao pai,” pronounced “tshiau phainn” in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), was “super bad” or “super fierce,” but as the term has gained popularity, it has come to be used in different contexts and can also be used to describe something impressive.
In his videos, Chao-ge often greets the audience with “chao pai,” and some people have followed suit by trying to add the term to their daily expressions as a special way of greeting people.
However, with closer observation of the live stream at the restaurant, Chao-ge went too far, as he kept swearing and shouting like a hoodlum. Did he think he was acting in a mafia movie and should call his gang to help him? It seems like he can no longer distinguish between reality and the cyberworld. The rationalization of such violent crimes is setting a terrible example for young Taiwanese.
In 1944, Columbia University sociologist Paul Lazarsfeld coined the term “opinion leader” to refer to a group of people who are far more familiar with media than others; these people become influential community celebrities, while most people start turning to them for new media content.
From studies, it could be concluded that an “opinion leader” refers to a person in a group who has gained others’ trust or has become the object of consultation due to some qualities or abilities. Such qualities enable an opinion leader to frequently and effectively influence other group members’ opinions or attitudes.
FOUR TYPES
In 2004, academics Sabine Trepte and Helmut Scherer categorized opinion leaders into four types using opinion leadership and product knowledge: informed opinion leaders, dazzlers, silent experts, as well as inerts — not-informed and non-opinion-leading — and they explored the media habits of these four types of people.
From Chao-ge’s rationalization of his violence and apparent criminal act, he is clearly unqualified to be an online opinion leader and his behavior is leading to more violence in society. After his arrest, some people joked online that they would not dare to leave bad reviews lower than two stars on the restaurant’s social media pages. Apart from this, do most people know they have been supporting a violent e-celeb?
Knight Chang is a political worker and has a doctorate in education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS