The Marshall Islands and Tuvalu have reaffirmed their ties with Taiwan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Monday, dispelling a rumor that Tuvalu might switch official diplomatic ties to Beijing.
The rumor, which came from an Australian publication’s interview with Tuvaluan Ambassador to Taiwan Bikenibeu Paeniu, suggested that Tuvalu would follow Nauru’s switching of ties from Taipei to Beijing. Nauru severed ties with Taipei on Sunday last week after the election of president-elect William Lai (賴清德), in an act widely seen as coercion by Beijing against Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
It is good that the Marshall Islands and Tuvalu would choose to remain Taiwan’s allies, but not for the recognition of Taiwan’s sovereignty that this relationship affords. China has used its poaching of Taiwan’s allies to pressure the DPP, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is highly critical of the DPP whenever an ally severs ties. In particular, KMT officials have used the severances as a basis for criticism of the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who has refused to accept China’s so-called “1992 consensus” — a tacit agreement between the KMT and Beijing that there is only “one China.”
Arguably, the KMT’s criticisms of Tsai in these instances amounts to collusion with the Chinese Communist Party, as could be said of some KMT candidates’ comments while campaigning in this year’s general elections, when they said that a vote for the DPP would be a vote for war with China.
If a friend is easily bought off by one’s enemy, then they were never a friend to begin with. Many of the former allies that severed ties with Taiwan over Tsai’s eight years in office were countries that could not offer good economic or military partnerships. They might have spoken up for Taiwan’s inclusion in UN organizations, but they often demanded hefty financial sums in return. There was little substance to these largely symbolic relationships, and they cost Taiwan’s taxpayers.
Taiwan must focus on fostering mutually beneficial relationships, regardless of their official nature. Taiwan has increased trade with Japan, Southeast Asian countries, the US and the EU. It has also ramped up academic and other exchanges, and opened Mandarin language schools in the US, the UK, France, Germany and elsewhere.
Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation and George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations research fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times op-ed article published on Dec. 29 last year underscored the importance of Taiwan continuing to seek closer ties with India and other countries concerned over Chinese aggression. India began rethinking its relationship with China following border skirmishes and is more receptive to Taiwan due to measures such as the New Southbound Policy, she wrote.
“Taiwan’s proactive approach became especially significant amid the concurrent decline in relations with China, which created a strategic window for Taiwan when China was constraining its international presence,” she wrote.
Japanese leaders have also increasingly expressed interest in closer ties with Taiwan due to perceived threats from China, and EU leaders have increasingly re-evaluated ties with China over trade imbalances and questions over its support for Russia’s war in Ukraine.
“It would be paramount for [Taiwan’s] incoming president to maintain the momentum achieved on the foreign policy front, especially considering the cautious approach adopted by countries toward Taiwan in the past,” Hashmi wrote.
Countries interested in ties with Taiwan still have disproportionate trade ties favoring China. Many countries seek to “de-risk” these ties, and Taiwan could play a key role, but it must proactively encourage countries to take risks involved with establishing closer ties. The more countries that distance themselves from China, the less threatening it becomes, and Taiwan should actively encourage that trend.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS