As Taiwan’s political parties prepare for next month’s election of a new legislative speaker, incoming Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator-at-large Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) says that one of his reasons for seeking the post is to keep an eye on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s corruption. Han accused the DPP government of corruption when he ran for president in 2020 and again when he was supporting New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi’s (侯友宜) presidential bid this month, and he is still saying the same thing.
The speaker and deputy speaker of the Legislative Yuan are supposed to be administratively neutral, so any legislator who wants to supervise the DPP government had better not serve in those roles.
This is precisely why Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who has declared his intention to strictly supervise the ruling party, said that he would not stand for election to either of these posts.
Evidently, the accusations of DPP government corruption that slip so easily off Han’s tongue are just populist rhetoric. Han often tells voters that the DPP is corrupt, but how does this measure up against the facts?
During the presidential campaign, Han and Hou’s campaign headquarters accused the DPP of major corruption in two government procurement cases, namely that of COVID-19 vaccines made by Taiwan’s Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp and that of eggs imported to relieve a domestic shortage.
However, although prosecutors have handled 62 cases concerning the Medigen vaccine, they concluded that there were no unlawful activities involved. They also found no evidence of corruption or other unlawful activity in relation to the egg imports.
In contrast, a KMT staffer concocted bogus “death threats” related to the egg imports, arousing public suspicions that the KMT was not acting in good faith.
These examples illustrate how the accusations that Han and other opposition party figures make about DPP corruption are no more than populist verbiage.
Of course, there is such a thing as corruption by governing parties, even in democratic nations. For example, it happened when Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), now chairman of the TPP, was mayor of Taipei, and also in some cases where the DPP was in office.
However, when it comes to the degree of corruption, neither of these parties compare to the KMT.
For example, former Nantou County commissioner Lee Chao-ching (李朝卿) of the KMT was convicted of taking more than 120 kickbacks between 2008 and 2012, mostly for post-typhoon reconstruction projects. Lee received prison sentences adding up to more than 400 years, to be served concurrently for 16 years and six months.
In Taiwan, if you say that a certain political party is corrupt, such a comment is regarded as free speech that is open to public discussion. That being the case, the party that has been accused of corruption cannot sue the accuser for defamation.
Consequently, this kind of rhetoric is often used by populists who want to attack their enemies without being held legally responsible.
Han’s mantra of claiming that the DPP’s corruption is serious is typical of how some politicians attack opposing political parties in Taiwan’s populist political environment.
Liu Shih-ming is an adjunct associate professor in the Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS