Ko’s reliability problem
On Tuesday last week, in a post on Facebook group “Love Agro Girl,” a mother of a high-school student described how her child purchased one of the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) “Little Grass” cards and participated in an event to support TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
“Love Agro Girl” criticized the TPP for cultivating “cult-like religious zealots” in the name of organizing “club activity.”
TPP Deputy Secretary-General Osmar Hsu (許甫) said that the party membership card is different from the Little Grass card.
Ko wrote on Facebook that the TPP has never promoted the Little Grass card among students, suggesting that the “Love Agro Girl” post was false.
Whether the TPP promoted the Little Grass card is not necessarily the problem. What worries parents more is that the line between participation in democracy and cult-like worship is somewhat blurred. Such a concerns are legitimate:
First, Ko has shown no integrity throughout his political career. During campaigning ahead of the presidential election, he initially agreed to collaborate with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), but soon regretted it and declined to honor the deal. For swing voters, he was by no means trustworthy.
People with enough social experience know that a person’s credibility takes years to establish and is their most valuable asset. As the leader of a political party, Ko has lost all credibility. How can such a person lead a country? He should not change his statements and should be emotionally stable, rather than suddenly crying as if he were an actor.
Ko remains the TPP’s chairman despite the election results, so the party has a lot to do to improve its trustworthiness.
Ko should be asked how he would deal with pressure from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). As a politician lacking any integrity and honesty, he should not be trusted.
Would he contribute to Taiwan’s democracy while rejecting authoritarianism and China’s aggression?
Being president would require Ko to be able to figure out how to collaborate with multiple countries. Would he be able to do that?
Parents, regardless of their political affiliation and stance, consider Ko to be an insincere and dishonest politician. The mother who wrote the “Love Agro Girl” post is not the only one. Ko must reflect upon his behavior and address his issues.
Second, Ko’s stance toward the CCP goes against mainstream public opinion in Taiwan. Only a few weeks ago, Ko wanted to include Chinese spouse Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) on the TPP’s list of legislator-at-large nominees, causing an uproar. The other parties asked whether he was pledging allegiance to China.
While he was Taipei mayor, Ko said that “two sides of the Strait are one family,” but when he was running for president, he said that he would follow President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) agenda.
Ko tends to adjust what he says as he sees fit, but the real problem is that he has never clarified his stance toward the CCP.
Today, polls show that Taiwanese generally identify themselves as Taiwanese, not Chinese. It is only natural that parents feel uneasy about Ko’s popularity and whether their children would be influenced by him. To reassure such parents, the TPP should comprehensively review its China stance.
In some way, the news about the Little Grass card shows that our younger generations are interested in political affairs and democratic participation. High-school students might not be able to consider the whole picture based on critical analysis, but their willingness to participate in politics should be encouraged and applauded.
In this sense, the TPP should be responsible for its supporters and Taiwan’s democracy. It must transform itself into a more trustworthy political party.
Hsin Na
Taoyuan City
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s