There has been a lot of international news commentary about Taiwan’s presidential election and its implications for cross-strait relations and security issues in the Indo-Pacific region. However, less has been discussed about the significance of the legislative election for women’s inclusion and representation in Taiwan.
This time, Taiwan elected a second female vice president, after electing and re-electing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as the first female president in 2016 and 2020. The legislative election on the same day set an impressive record for women’s representation, with 47 women elected out of 113 members of the legislature, constituting 41.59 percent of the seats. That is comparable to the 48 female lawmakers in the outgoing 10th Legislative Yuan.
This achievement continues to position Taiwan as a global leader in women’s political participation. The global average for women’s representation in legislative bodies is 26.7 percent and Taiwan’s accomplishment exceeds both the global average and the Asian average of 21.3 percent. Taiwan would have been ranked 26th worldwide as of last month if the Inter-Parliamentary Union included Taiwan in its monthly ranking of women’s share in parliaments.
Taiwan boasts a significantly higher percentage than South Korea (19.1 percent, ranked 122nd) and Japan (10.3 percent, ranked 166th). The fact that Taiwan is the first nation in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage should also be noted.
My analysis of the election results reveals that out of the 310 candidates running for district seats, 106 were women and 204 were men. Interestingly, the difference in success rates between female and male candidates was not statistically significant, suggesting that women were just as likely to win as their male counterparts.
Male and female candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had a similar success rate of 52 percent. The male success rate was slightly higher than female rate among Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates (58 percent versus 52.38 percent), although this difference was not statistically significant.
Examining the impact of incumbency on election outcomes, 28 female members from the current Legislative Yuan and 37 current male members vied for district seats, constituting 21 percent of the total candidates. Again, the re-election rates for incumbent women (71.43 percent) and men (70.27 percent) were similar. Of the 73 districts, 20 are to continue to be represented by female representatives, while nine are to transition from a female to a male representative, and six experience the reverse.
Legislators-at-large, accounting for 34 seats, witnessed the return of four women and five men from the 10th Legislative Yuan, all affiliated with the DPP. Three women and three men secured seats for the Lowland and Highland Aborigine constituencies, with one female legislator being re-elected.
Taiwan’s legislative election marks a continuously significant stride toward women’s representation and inclusion in the legislature. The fact that female candidates were equally competitive in their bids for district seats is notable.
Nathan Batto, a professor at Academia Sinica, has previously showed that a gender quota at the local level has increased women’s representation at that level, and they continue to win national-level non-quota Legislative Yuan seats. On the other hand, national-level legislators-at-large mostly do not succeed at getting elected to district-level seats.
National Taiwan University political science professor Huang Chang-ling (黃長玲) has shown that more than half of female legislators-at-large who served between 2008 and 2012 left politics after their term was over, compared with 30 percent of their male counterparts. In this election, only three female legislators-at-large ran in district elections and none won a seat. It is important to encourage and support legislators-at-large to continue their political careers by leveraging their political experience rather than merely relying on them to attract votes.
Taiwan is the first nation to hold major elections this year. I hope Taiwan sets a global example not only for its transparent and democratic elections, but also for the high level of gender equality in government. Beyond the numbers, Taiwan must continue making politics more inclusive and diverse by passing more bills to achieve substantive gender equality.
Lee Young-Im is an associate professor of political science at California State University, Sacramento, and a 2024 Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan Fellow.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS