Due to a series of funding irregularities, Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is mired in controversy. To save itself, the party is faced with two pivotal questions: whether to disband its internal factions and who should be the next president. The LDP president, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, apologized to the public and announced that he would disband his faction. On Friday and Saturday, Japanese media reported Kishida’s decision. Former LDP secretary-general Toshihiro Nikai announced that he would follow suit and disband his own. Another major faction, the Abe faction headed by Diet member Ryu Shionoya, will be disbanded as well.
The Kishida faction (known officially as Kochikai) was established in 1957 by former Japanese prime minister Hayato Ikeda, whose major goal was to foster Japan’s economic growth. Kochikai has produced five prime ministers. Today, active politicians affiliated with the faction include Kishida, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi and Foreign Minister Yoko Kamikawa.
Nikai, the head of the [former] Shisuikai faction, is known for his pro-China stance. The faction had 38 members, making it far from a major one.
The Abe faction (Seiwakai) is the largest, established in 1979 by former Japanese prime minister Takeo Fukuda. A pro-Taiwan politician, Fukuda founded Seiwakai to counteract Ikeda’s Kochikai. This faction has produced four prime ministers. After former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe died, the faction lacked a strong leader. Last year, due to fundraising scandals, five Seiwakai members known for their pro-Taiwan stance resigned. The situation has worsened, culminating in disbandment.
The Nikkei Shimbun reported that the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office started investigating those who failed to report having recieved more than ¥30 million (US$204,000) from fundraising parties. The amount that the Abe faction failed to list totaled about ¥600 million, the Nikai faction about ¥200 million and the Kishida faction about ¥30 million. The other two LDP factions, former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso’s faction (Shikokai) and the Motegi faction (Heisei Kenkyukai), are not indicted, as their unreported amounts have not reached ¥30 million.
For decades the LDP has functioned through factions. The people of Japan have long criticized this political system. Many have advocated disbanding the factions. However, before a new mechanism replaces it, the LDP would operate through factions.
Survey data released on Thursday by Jiji Press showed that support for the LDP dropped to a record 14.6 percent, and the approval rate for the Kishida Cabinet was only 18.6 percent. Kishida took the initiative and disbanded his own faction, hoping that other LDP faction leaders would do the same. However, Aso, whose faction is now the largest, did not comply.
Likewise, a potential candidate for the next LDP president, LDP Secretary General Toshimitsu Motegi, is likely to maintain his faction. A Japanese Diet member, Motegi has previously served as minister of foreign affairs, minister of economy, trade and industry and the LDP Policy Research Council’s chairman. Both Motegi and Aso are unaffected by the scandals, and given that Motegi is 15 years younger than Aso, he is likely to come out on top. A new organ aiming at political reform is to be established in the party, and we are likely to see how the internal competition plays out soon.
The approval rate for the Kishida Cabinet has fallen below 30 percent, the level at which a prime minister is considered to have entered the “danger zone.” Kishida is in danger. It is highly unlikely that he would be elected as the next LDP president.
Wang Hui-sheng is the chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan.
Translated by Emma Liu
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then