Chinese stocks just capped another dismal week, with a gauge of Chinese firms listed in Hong Kong languishing at the bottom of global equity index rankings for the year so far.
Grim milestones have kept piling up in recent days: Tokyo has just overtaken Shanghai as Asia’s biggest equity market, while India’s valuation premium over China has hit a record. A meltdown in Chinese shares is wreaking havoc on China’s asset management industry, pushing mutual fund closures to a five-year high.
The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI) has already lost 11 percent this year. Coming after a record four-year losing streak, the slump is reinforcing a structural shift that is seeing everyone from active money managers to passive funds turn their back on the world’s second-largest stock market.
In all, US$6.3 trillion has been wiped out from the market value of Chinese and Hong Kong stocks since the peak it reached in 2021, underscoring the challenge that Beijing faces as it seeks to arrest a decline in investor confidence. Authorities have ruled out the use of massive stimulus to revive the flagging economy, leaving traders wondering when things will improve.
“What we are seeing this year so far really is a continuation of what we saw last year,” AllianceBernstein chief investment officer of China equities John Lin said in an interview on Wednesday on Bloomberg TV. “These squeezing-the-toothpaste type of stimulus policies so far haven’t been able to turn around the underlying bottom-up fundamentals of areas like the property sector.”
Hong Kong’s HSCEI plunged more than 6 percent this week and is on track to record its worst January performance in eight years. In China, the CSI 300 Index has dropped in nine of the past 10 weeks. Signs that state funds likely bought exchange-traded funds and a decision by China’s largest brokerage to suspend short selling for some clients failed to halt the losing run.
The headwinds buffeting the market are well documented: China’s real-estate sector remains a trouble spot, deflationary pressures are building and a long-running feud between Beijing and Washington refuses to go away, with the US election set to take place later this year.
In recent days, uncertainties about the trajectory of US interest rates and the threat of an imminent blowout of local stock derivatives have added to investor worries.
Asian fund managers have cut their allocation to China by 12 percentage points to a net 20 percent underweight, the lowest in more than a year, the latest Bank of America survey showed.
Managers of benchmark-tracking funds have sold a net US$300 million of shares traded in China and Hong Kong this month, Morgan Stanley analysis showed. That is a reversal from the last half of last year, when they bought US$700 million on a net basis even as stock indices declined.
“China is a waiting game and we continue to be waiting,” said Bank Julius Baer & Co head of Asia research Mark Matthews, whose firm is mostly avoiding Chinese equities.
Beijing’s efforts to reassure investors have been met with skepticism from investors, many of whom worry that authorities are behind the curve. While the People’s Bank of China took steps last month to pump cash into the financial system, it bucked widespread expectations for cutting a key policy rate on Monday last week.
Speaking to leaders at the World Economic Forum this week, Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強) trumpeted his nation’s ability to hit its roughly 5 percent growth target for this year without flooding the economy with “massive stimulus.”
Right now, the loss of confidence is so severe that even attractive valuations are of little help. The MSCI China Index has never been this cheap versus the S&P 500 gauge from a forward earnings estimate perspective. Still, bets on a short-term rebound have failed to materialize.
“The government seems very sanguine about the economy,” Abrdn PLC investment director for Asian equities Xin-Yao Ng said. “The market might not even trust the 5 percent growth figure, it certainly has a much more negative view on the economy and definitely believes Beijing needs a big fiscal response.”
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s