Chinese stocks just capped another dismal week, with a gauge of Chinese firms listed in Hong Kong languishing at the bottom of global equity index rankings for the year so far.
Grim milestones have kept piling up in recent days: Tokyo has just overtaken Shanghai as Asia’s biggest equity market, while India’s valuation premium over China has hit a record. A meltdown in Chinese shares is wreaking havoc on China’s asset management industry, pushing mutual fund closures to a five-year high.
The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI) has already lost 11 percent this year. Coming after a record four-year losing streak, the slump is reinforcing a structural shift that is seeing everyone from active money managers to passive funds turn their back on the world’s second-largest stock market.
In all, US$6.3 trillion has been wiped out from the market value of Chinese and Hong Kong stocks since the peak it reached in 2021, underscoring the challenge that Beijing faces as it seeks to arrest a decline in investor confidence. Authorities have ruled out the use of massive stimulus to revive the flagging economy, leaving traders wondering when things will improve.
“What we are seeing this year so far really is a continuation of what we saw last year,” AllianceBernstein chief investment officer of China equities John Lin said in an interview on Wednesday on Bloomberg TV. “These squeezing-the-toothpaste type of stimulus policies so far haven’t been able to turn around the underlying bottom-up fundamentals of areas like the property sector.”
Hong Kong’s HSCEI plunged more than 6 percent this week and is on track to record its worst January performance in eight years. In China, the CSI 300 Index has dropped in nine of the past 10 weeks. Signs that state funds likely bought exchange-traded funds and a decision by China’s largest brokerage to suspend short selling for some clients failed to halt the losing run.
The headwinds buffeting the market are well documented: China’s real-estate sector remains a trouble spot, deflationary pressures are building and a long-running feud between Beijing and Washington refuses to go away, with the US election set to take place later this year.
In recent days, uncertainties about the trajectory of US interest rates and the threat of an imminent blowout of local stock derivatives have added to investor worries.
Asian fund managers have cut their allocation to China by 12 percentage points to a net 20 percent underweight, the lowest in more than a year, the latest Bank of America survey showed.
Managers of benchmark-tracking funds have sold a net US$300 million of shares traded in China and Hong Kong this month, Morgan Stanley analysis showed. That is a reversal from the last half of last year, when they bought US$700 million on a net basis even as stock indices declined.
“China is a waiting game and we continue to be waiting,” said Bank Julius Baer & Co head of Asia research Mark Matthews, whose firm is mostly avoiding Chinese equities.
Beijing’s efforts to reassure investors have been met with skepticism from investors, many of whom worry that authorities are behind the curve. While the People’s Bank of China took steps last month to pump cash into the financial system, it bucked widespread expectations for cutting a key policy rate on Monday last week.
Speaking to leaders at the World Economic Forum this week, Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強) trumpeted his nation’s ability to hit its roughly 5 percent growth target for this year without flooding the economy with “massive stimulus.”
Right now, the loss of confidence is so severe that even attractive valuations are of little help. The MSCI China Index has never been this cheap versus the S&P 500 gauge from a forward earnings estimate perspective. Still, bets on a short-term rebound have failed to materialize.
“The government seems very sanguine about the economy,” Abrdn PLC investment director for Asian equities Xin-Yao Ng said. “The market might not even trust the 5 percent growth figure, it certainly has a much more negative view on the economy and definitely believes Beijing needs a big fiscal response.”
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS