In the run-up to the presidential and legislative elections, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) called some opinion polls “bogus.” Rumors circulated that the election process and results might be unfair. These rumors, which made many TPP supporters feel uneasy, have grown louder since the election results were announced. It is reminiscent of the unrest that followed former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) narrow-margin re-election in 2004. One video alleging vote rigging has received more than 2 million views. Such a video could seriously tarnish the good image Taiwan’s voting system has attained over the course of many years.
Many unscientific opinion polls were carried out before the election and they likely engendered unrealistic confidence in Ko’s supporters. Since the results have come out, no one is taking responsibility or being held responsible for those fake opinion polls. Ko’s supporters are still highly strung. At such a time, the main concern for Ko and the TPP should not be about who is to become the next legislative speaker.
Instead, they should urge their supporters to calm down and stop falsely accusing the nation’s election workers of committing fraud. The public’s confidence in democracy should not be sacrificed for the sake of a single party’s political interests.
In the past, no matter which candidate had to make a concession speech, they would congratulate their successful opponent and respect the result. Even in the 2020 presidential election, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) made a speech conceding defeat, congratulating his Democratic Progressive Party rival, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and promised to abide by the result. In contrast, Ko’s post-defeat speech hardly mentioned these things. Just as his supporters were sowing election doubts, he appeared to egg them on by blaming his defeat on the election procedure and its lack of absentee voting. The TPP claims to view things in a scientific and rational manner. From this perspective, news reports identified problems at fewer than 20 of the 17,000 ballot-counting stations — far too few to impact the elections.
The book How Democracies Die by US professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt says how, in past US presidential elections, the Republican and Democratic parties maintained a degree of institutional autonomy. They respected the results, avoided raising unfounded doubts about the election process and did not view their opponents as treasonous enemies. The authors wrote that this unspoken rule remained unbroken until former president Donald Trump was elected.
By the same token, now that the election results have been announced from ballot-counting stations staffed, among others, by hundreds of TPP supporters whom the party encouraged to serve as scrutineers, Ko and the TPP should play their proper part by urging their supporters to keep calm, respect the democratic process and accept the election results.
Ko and the TPP seriously harm society with their spurious accusations of vote-rigging. They might want to explain to their supporters why some opinion polls were so different from the election results, but they should not drag down the entire democratic system.
Furthermore, how, in the current atmosphere, are they to set things right for all those election workers who spent an entire Saturday in a polling booth, yet still have to suffer unjustified accusations of vote-rigging? How do they intend to restore people’s faith in the democratic system, and will they ever apologize to their electoral rivals and to their own supporters?
Ko Chia-wei is a former president of the National Chengchi University Student Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS