Banning breeds resistance
In 1979, when I was a student at a teacher training university, the democratic movement was thriving. We were motivated to fight for a better Taiwan under the dangwai (黨外) or “outside the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)” banner. Many dangwai magazines were published and they became a channel for developing Taiwan’s democratization.
At that time, the school’s disciplinary office tried banning dangwai magazines and books, yet one military instructor surnamed Tsao (曹) went against the grain.
“Our college is an educational institution to train teachers. We should of course comply with the law. That is the most important thing. Given that the publication of these books and magazines was authorized by the Government Information Office, we do not have the right to ban them. If they criticize the government for no reason or with malicious intent, teachers and instructors should take the opportunity to teach students the truth. Students should not be prohibited from reading what they want to read,” Tsao said.
For the martial law era, what he said was extraordinarily democratic and open-minded. His words laid the foundation for my understanding of democracy and urged me to reflect on the authoritarian regime. I still think about him, grateful for his teaching.
The late democracy advocate Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) gave his life for Taiwan by pursuing unconditional freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is a foundational principle of the DPP, based on the idea that one’s thoughts, whatever they are, should never be criminalized. This is also a universally embraced value.
The DPP did not achieve a majority victory in the legislative elections this year and there are many reasons. Video-sharing platforms might have played a role, but it is only one factor. If those platforms are unlawful, prosecutors, investigators and police should intervene and conduct investigations. It is improper to ban platforms outright, yet some DPP politicians have said that TikTok should be banned.
It would create more problems if too many public restrictions are imposed. Prohibiting a piece of information only makes it more widespread, and violating freedom of speech would make Taiwan no better than a communist country.
Hopefully, all DPP members would consider the public first. Policymakers should reflect on past mistakes and seek meaningful collaboration with opposition parties. Only then can the public truly benefit.
Tu Juo-fei
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS