Among the 52 legislative seats secured by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), local factions have obtained 31 and the “blue fighters” 21. This helps us see through the nature of the KMT: a party dominated by local political families and pro-China “blue fighters.”
The “blue fighter” faction is spearheaded by Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康). Other “blue fighters” include Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇), who often made disparaging comments about the government on pro-China media, and Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), who allegedly passed classified material on Taiwan’s indigenous submarine program to South Korea.
Although they acted disloyally to Taiwan, the KMT fully supported Wang and Ma. Younger party members also demanded that KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) step down and be replaced by Jaw, which would doubtlessly increase the power of the “blue fighters” faction.
More terrifying is that Jaw and former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) support a “one China” policy and are against Taiwanese independence. They discount Taiwan’s independence and devalue its autonomy.
Before the KMT started localizing itself, it could not mention ruling party alternations or power balances. Some Taiwanese have been deceived by such slogans. Before the KMT won its 52 legislative seats and became the largest party in the Legislative Yuan, Ma said that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) should be trusted, China intervened in the elections and KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) kowtowed to China. The KMT’s victory is a great challenge to local political parties. Influenced by Chinese video-sharing platforms, Taiwan’s democratic consciousness is under threat.
As long as the KMT denies Taiwan’s sovereignty, it is a foreign political party that does not belong here. Taiwanese should not accept the KMT as a Taiwanese political party. As long as it is pro-China, Taiwanese should stay vigilant. Unless the KMT realizes it has made a mistake and renames itself to something like the “Taiwanese Nationalist Party,” it would remain a foreign political party. The KMT must affirm a “Taiwan first” principle before it is recognized as a Taiwanese political party.
Regrettably, millions of pan-blue camp supporters and KMT members — including former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), on whom former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had placed high hopes — have failed to change the KMT. In this pro-China political party, local faction members are obsessed with their own vested interests. They are unaware of their Taiwanese identity and incapable of achieving anything meaningful for Taiwan.
For half a century, under the rule of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), Taiwanese were forcibly educated to identify as “true Chinese.” The KMT has laid a solid foundation for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It is no wonder why former CCP chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) said he would not worry about Taiwanese independence, as Chiang Kai-shek would not allow it to happen. KMT disciples and numerous pan-blue camp supporters would continue fighting Taiwanese independence. The ideation of a “great China” is not anti-CCP at all.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) did not win a legislative majority. While seeking collaboration with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the DPP should not be impeded by the white camp. Instead, it should focus on proposing good agendas and catering to the public’s needs. In doing so, the DPP would gain public support and the TPP would not dare to go against the public will.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Emma Liu
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS