Among the 52 legislative seats secured by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), local factions have obtained 31 and the “blue fighters” 21. This helps us see through the nature of the KMT: a party dominated by local political families and pro-China “blue fighters.”
The “blue fighter” faction is spearheaded by Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康). Other “blue fighters” include Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇), who often made disparaging comments about the government on pro-China media, and Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), who allegedly passed classified material on Taiwan’s indigenous submarine program to South Korea.
Although they acted disloyally to Taiwan, the KMT fully supported Wang and Ma. Younger party members also demanded that KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) step down and be replaced by Jaw, which would doubtlessly increase the power of the “blue fighters” faction.
More terrifying is that Jaw and former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) support a “one China” policy and are against Taiwanese independence. They discount Taiwan’s independence and devalue its autonomy.
Before the KMT started localizing itself, it could not mention ruling party alternations or power balances. Some Taiwanese have been deceived by such slogans. Before the KMT won its 52 legislative seats and became the largest party in the Legislative Yuan, Ma said that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) should be trusted, China intervened in the elections and KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) kowtowed to China. The KMT’s victory is a great challenge to local political parties. Influenced by Chinese video-sharing platforms, Taiwan’s democratic consciousness is under threat.
As long as the KMT denies Taiwan’s sovereignty, it is a foreign political party that does not belong here. Taiwanese should not accept the KMT as a Taiwanese political party. As long as it is pro-China, Taiwanese should stay vigilant. Unless the KMT realizes it has made a mistake and renames itself to something like the “Taiwanese Nationalist Party,” it would remain a foreign political party. The KMT must affirm a “Taiwan first” principle before it is recognized as a Taiwanese political party.
Regrettably, millions of pan-blue camp supporters and KMT members — including former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), on whom former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had placed high hopes — have failed to change the KMT. In this pro-China political party, local faction members are obsessed with their own vested interests. They are unaware of their Taiwanese identity and incapable of achieving anything meaningful for Taiwan.
For half a century, under the rule of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), Taiwanese were forcibly educated to identify as “true Chinese.” The KMT has laid a solid foundation for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It is no wonder why former CCP chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) said he would not worry about Taiwanese independence, as Chiang Kai-shek would not allow it to happen. KMT disciples and numerous pan-blue camp supporters would continue fighting Taiwanese independence. The ideation of a “great China” is not anti-CCP at all.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) did not win a legislative majority. While seeking collaboration with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the DPP should not be impeded by the white camp. Instead, it should focus on proposing good agendas and catering to the public’s needs. In doing so, the DPP would gain public support and the TPP would not dare to go against the public will.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Emma Liu
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS