Taiwan’s elections marked several unprecedented developments. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) secured its third consecutive presidential term, a historic feat, as no party in Taiwan had previously achieved this milestone. Moreover, the results garnered international attention, with countries sending congratulatory messages to the president-elect, Vice President William Lai (賴清德).
During DPP election rallies, it became evident that the majority of Taiwanese resonated with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) foreign-policy approach. When Tsai assumed power eight years ago, China suspended cross-strait dialogue, heightened tensions through intensified “gray zone” activities and sought to diminish Taiwan’s international space.
Despite a reduction in the number of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, the country has gained traction and its engagement with non-diplomatic partners and like-minded democracies has grown.
Lai has stated his intention to uphold Tsai’s cross-strait “status quo” and continue her broader foreign policy approach. It appears highly probable that his administration is to prioritize continuity, with an emphasis on bolstering ties with like-minded democracies. Continued focus on the New Southbound Policy seems likely, given its successes. Taiwan has also seen closer ties with India and Australia as a result.
India held significant importance during the Tsai administration, and it would not be surprising that Lai would continue to prioritize relations with New Delhi. India has until now refrained from extending congratulations to the president-elect, despite a strategic shift in its approach to Taiwan.
The absence of a congratulatory message should not be misconstrued as a lack of interest. Quite the opposite, India is embracing a more deliberate and serious approach to cultivating an enduring partnership with Taiwan across diverse domains. This strategic shift signals India’s departure from strict adherence to China’s red lines, distinguishing it as the sole major country to unequivocally abandon references to the “one China” policy. Rather than conforming to conventional expectations of sending congratulatory messages, India’s evolving Taiwan policy signifies a genuine intent to build substantive and meaningful connections.
In light of India’s formidable challenges, particularly within its borders and in managing China’s incursions, the evolving Taiwan policy appears to adopt a more nuanced approach. It places a premium on attaining tangible outcomes and nurturing robust relationships, favoring a measured approach over overt vocalization and recognizing the need for strategic and thoughtful engagement.
Beyond India’s Taiwan policy, it is imperative for the incoming Lai administration to continue fostering strong ties with India, a pivotal country within the New Southbound Policy framework and the Indo-Pacific vision. It is only logical for Lai’s administration to prioritize India and elevate its efforts to engage with it.
Despite considerable achievements, a renewed perspective to utilize untapped potential is essential. It is prudent for the new administration to strengthen the New Southbound Policy, with India retaining its status as a focal country. To advance relations, Lai could consider taking several strategic steps. Despite India’s momentum and support for Taiwan, there is ample room for bolstering ties.
Chinese disinformation on the now-shelved India-Taiwan migration and mobility pact inflicted significant harm on progress made in India-Taiwan relations. The Lai administration should contemplate restarting negotiations to effectively address and overcome the damage caused by the disinformation surrounding the pact.
The focus should also extend to bolstering education ties and attracting more students from India for language training and higher education. Enhancing education and professional collaborations, particularly in the realms of science and technology, would greatly contribute to the bolstering of bilateral relations.
Similar to the Tsai administration, Lai should encourage semiconductor giants to explore opportunities in India. While India has been seeking Taiwanese investments to support its semiconductor industry ecosystem, it is now opportune for Taiwan to consider India a viable and serious investment destination.
India, too, should play its part in bolstering this partnership. There is vocal acknowledgement that economic ties with Taiwan are crucial, and it increasingly sees Taiwan as a key economic and technology partner.
India should also take Taiwan’s needs into account. The feasibility study for a free trade agreement negotiation, shelved during former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration in the 2010s, should be revisited. Building economic institutional links would be mutually beneficial, and India stands to gain significantly from such collaboration.
A change in leadership presents an opportunity for countries to revitalize ties. In the case of India and Taiwan, this represents a chance to elevate relations to new heights. This is not only mutually beneficial, but also holds significance for the broader Indo-Pacific region, making India-Taiwan engagement essential.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation and the George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS