Taiwan’s elections marked several unprecedented developments. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) secured its third consecutive presidential term, a historic feat, as no party in Taiwan had previously achieved this milestone. Moreover, the results garnered international attention, with countries sending congratulatory messages to the president-elect, Vice President William Lai (賴清德).
During DPP election rallies, it became evident that the majority of Taiwanese resonated with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) foreign-policy approach. When Tsai assumed power eight years ago, China suspended cross-strait dialogue, heightened tensions through intensified “gray zone” activities and sought to diminish Taiwan’s international space.
Despite a reduction in the number of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, the country has gained traction and its engagement with non-diplomatic partners and like-minded democracies has grown.
Lai has stated his intention to uphold Tsai’s cross-strait “status quo” and continue her broader foreign policy approach. It appears highly probable that his administration is to prioritize continuity, with an emphasis on bolstering ties with like-minded democracies. Continued focus on the New Southbound Policy seems likely, given its successes. Taiwan has also seen closer ties with India and Australia as a result.
India held significant importance during the Tsai administration, and it would not be surprising that Lai would continue to prioritize relations with New Delhi. India has until now refrained from extending congratulations to the president-elect, despite a strategic shift in its approach to Taiwan.
The absence of a congratulatory message should not be misconstrued as a lack of interest. Quite the opposite, India is embracing a more deliberate and serious approach to cultivating an enduring partnership with Taiwan across diverse domains. This strategic shift signals India’s departure from strict adherence to China’s red lines, distinguishing it as the sole major country to unequivocally abandon references to the “one China” policy. Rather than conforming to conventional expectations of sending congratulatory messages, India’s evolving Taiwan policy signifies a genuine intent to build substantive and meaningful connections.
In light of India’s formidable challenges, particularly within its borders and in managing China’s incursions, the evolving Taiwan policy appears to adopt a more nuanced approach. It places a premium on attaining tangible outcomes and nurturing robust relationships, favoring a measured approach over overt vocalization and recognizing the need for strategic and thoughtful engagement.
Beyond India’s Taiwan policy, it is imperative for the incoming Lai administration to continue fostering strong ties with India, a pivotal country within the New Southbound Policy framework and the Indo-Pacific vision. It is only logical for Lai’s administration to prioritize India and elevate its efforts to engage with it.
Despite considerable achievements, a renewed perspective to utilize untapped potential is essential. It is prudent for the new administration to strengthen the New Southbound Policy, with India retaining its status as a focal country. To advance relations, Lai could consider taking several strategic steps. Despite India’s momentum and support for Taiwan, there is ample room for bolstering ties.
Chinese disinformation on the now-shelved India-Taiwan migration and mobility pact inflicted significant harm on progress made in India-Taiwan relations. The Lai administration should contemplate restarting negotiations to effectively address and overcome the damage caused by the disinformation surrounding the pact.
The focus should also extend to bolstering education ties and attracting more students from India for language training and higher education. Enhancing education and professional collaborations, particularly in the realms of science and technology, would greatly contribute to the bolstering of bilateral relations.
Similar to the Tsai administration, Lai should encourage semiconductor giants to explore opportunities in India. While India has been seeking Taiwanese investments to support its semiconductor industry ecosystem, it is now opportune for Taiwan to consider India a viable and serious investment destination.
India, too, should play its part in bolstering this partnership. There is vocal acknowledgement that economic ties with Taiwan are crucial, and it increasingly sees Taiwan as a key economic and technology partner.
India should also take Taiwan’s needs into account. The feasibility study for a free trade agreement negotiation, shelved during former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration in the 2010s, should be revisited. Building economic institutional links would be mutually beneficial, and India stands to gain significantly from such collaboration.
A change in leadership presents an opportunity for countries to revitalize ties. In the case of India and Taiwan, this represents a chance to elevate relations to new heights. This is not only mutually beneficial, but also holds significance for the broader Indo-Pacific region, making India-Taiwan engagement essential.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation and the George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS