Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was last in the three-way presidential election, but his name was everywhere in news media and on political talk shows in the past week.
Some have said Ko and the TPP performed well for a four-year-old party — Ko won 26.46 percent of the presidential vote and the TPP received 22.07 percent of the party votes — yet more attention was put on how some supporters hinted at electoral fraud and whether he has been “swimming naked” in his polling claims.
Following the elections, unverified short videos of election workers reciting and tallying votes were posted on social media, claiming that vote-rigging might have occurred. The videos went viral after a few influencers shared them, including a popular and outspoken Ko supporter on YouTube.
The Central Election Commission said election procedures were transparent and allowed parties’ overseers and the public to monitor the vote counting. The Taiwan FactCheck Center and MyGoPen also dismissed the claims.
However, Ko said that “it is impossible to conduct large-scale election fraud in Taiwan,” but left room for speculation. He wrote on Facebook that he received clips from supporters showing hidden layers in ballot boxes, hundreds of stolen ballots and recited numbers not matching tallies.
Even before the elections, Ko hinted at the possibility in a Pingtung rally on Dec. 24, saying: “I’ve wondered if they would dare to conduct election fraud, but I found they aren’t even afraid of cutting 44 seconds, so if our overseer teams have time, please monitor the vote count in case they really carry out vote-rigging to make us lose.” The TPP claimed a YouTube live broadcast of the televised presidential debate cut out 44 seconds as Ko was presenting his policies.
Moreover, when Ko and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were negotiating an ultimately doomed joint presidential ticket in November last year, nearly all polling showed higher support for New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and as later polls showed the same pattern, Ko refused to accept them.
He said new media and polling organizations were conducting bad polling and on Dec. 19 challenged them, saying he would record the poll results and “see which of them have been swimming naked when the tide goes out.”
Ko and the TPP said he was the runner-up in the three-way election and only lost to Vice President William Lai (賴清德) by a small margin.
However, many politicians and pundits pored over poll results, finding most of them were more accurate than Ko’s claim, which was based on TPP internal polling.
Ko on Wednesday released a YouTube video in which he said the TPP’s polling is “at least not fake,” but that the discrepancy was due to supporters being “young, highly educated and independent voters,” who “need to work,” thus resulting in a low turnout, and that Taiwan’s voting system is “outdated” and should include absentee and online voting, blaming the system for his polling inaccuracy and loss.
As Ko built support among aloof or politically unfamiliar young people or first-time voters by stirring up frustration and resentment, paying lip service to low salaries, inflation and housing price issues, his remarks display poor sportsmanship and irresponsibility.
By hinting at counting flaws, blaming low turnout and the voting system and KMT “dump-save” effect manipulation, while insisting on TPP polling authenticity and being unwilling to directly concede defeat and congratulate the winner, Ko is eroding young people’s confidence in election integrity and sowing distrust, including on polls and telling supporters that news media were paid to ignore or paint him in a bad light, only for the partisan benefit of supporter retention.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s