Work with TPP to avoid Han
The result of the legislative election left the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) six seats short of the 57 seats needed to hold a majority in the Legislative Yuan. Hopefully, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the president-elect, would summon up the goodwill to invite Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) to talk about the election of the next legislative speaker and deputy speaker.
It would be better for the DPP to make do with the position of deputy speaker and concede the speaker’s chair to TPP legislator-elect Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) than, heaven forbid, let the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) China-friendly legislator-at-large-in-waiting Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) become speaker.
The KMT has at times jokingly called Huang “[President] Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) girl.” During the 2016 legislative elections, Tsai, in her capacity as chairperson of the DPP, recommended that the voters in Taipei’s Nangang-Neihu (南港-內湖) constituency vote for Huang, who was at that time standing as the People First Party’s candidate, but unfortunately Huang was not elected. Admiral Huang Shu-kuang (黃曙光) — the officer in charge of the indigenous submarine-building project in Taiwan — is her elder brother. Since the confirmation of the election results on Saturday, the KMT has been angrily accusing Vivian Huang of being the main culprit behind the failure to agree on a joint presidential election ticket between the KMT and the TPP.
Supporters of the DPP and its pan-green allies need to recognize the political reality and face this bitter historic lesson. The DPP must find ways to cooperate with the TPP’s Ko and Vivian Huang on important issues. Politics is a product of compromise and definitely not a zero-sum game.
Chiu Jih-ming
Taipei
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS