Work with TPP to avoid Han
The result of the legislative election left the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) six seats short of the 57 seats needed to hold a majority in the Legislative Yuan. Hopefully, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the president-elect, would summon up the goodwill to invite Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) to talk about the election of the next legislative speaker and deputy speaker.
It would be better for the DPP to make do with the position of deputy speaker and concede the speaker’s chair to TPP legislator-elect Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) than, heaven forbid, let the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) China-friendly legislator-at-large-in-waiting Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) become speaker.
The KMT has at times jokingly called Huang “[President] Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) girl.” During the 2016 legislative elections, Tsai, in her capacity as chairperson of the DPP, recommended that the voters in Taipei’s Nangang-Neihu (南港-內湖) constituency vote for Huang, who was at that time standing as the People First Party’s candidate, but unfortunately Huang was not elected. Admiral Huang Shu-kuang (黃曙光) — the officer in charge of the indigenous submarine-building project in Taiwan — is her elder brother. Since the confirmation of the election results on Saturday, the KMT has been angrily accusing Vivian Huang of being the main culprit behind the failure to agree on a joint presidential election ticket between the KMT and the TPP.
Supporters of the DPP and its pan-green allies need to recognize the political reality and face this bitter historic lesson. The DPP must find ways to cooperate with the TPP’s Ko and Vivian Huang on important issues. Politics is a product of compromise and definitely not a zero-sum game.
Chiu Jih-ming
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
RSS